Observational studyScientific reports2023
Data-driven, two-stage machine learning algorithm-based prediction scheme for assessing 1-year and 3-year mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of treatment outcomes and quantitative analysis of contributing factors in fertility induction therapy for adolescent male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- A machine-learning method for predicting the 1-year risk of death in maintenance hemodialysis patients based on continuous compliance with dialysis quality indicators.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Investigating long-term risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection from fluoroquinolones and the key contributing factors using machine learning methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Present State and Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery · 2025Review
- Use of machine learning models to predict mortality in dialysis patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Life expectancy is likely to be substantially reduced in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (CHD). However, machine learning (ML) may predict the risk factors of mortality in patients with CHD by analyzing the serum laboratory data from regular dialysis routine. This study aimed to establish the mortality prediction model of CHD patients by adopting two-stage ML algorithm-based prediction scheme, combined with importance of risk factors identified by different ML methods. This is a retrospective, observational cohort study. We included 800 patients undergoing CHD between December 2006 and December 2012 in Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital. This study analyzed laboratory data including 44 indicators. We used five ML methods, namely, logistic regression (LGR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB), to develop a two-stage ML algorithm-based prediction scheme and evaluate the important factors that predict CHD mortality. LGR served as a bench method. Regarding the validation and testing datasets from 1- and 3-year mortality prediction model, the RF had better accuracy and area-under-curve results among the five different ML methods. The stepwise RF model, which incorporates the most important factors of CHD mortality risk based on the average rank from DT, RF, GB, and XGB, exhibited superior predictive performance compared to LGR in predicting mortality among CHD patients over both 1-year and 3-year periods. We had developed a two-stage ML algorithm-based prediction scheme by implementing the stepwise RF that demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting mortality in patients with CHD over 1- and 3-year periods. The findings of this study can offer valuable information to nephrologists, enhancing patient-centered decision-making and increasing awareness about risky laboratory data, particularly for patients with a high short-term mortality risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.