ArticleScientific reports2023
Deep learning-enabled breast cancer endocrine response determination from H&E staining based on ESR1 signaling activity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast Cancer Hormone Receptor Status Determination from H&E-Stained Biopsy Images Using Pixel-Level Classifiers.Cancers · 2026Article
- Review
- How artificial intelligence applied to digital pathology could guide treatment personalization in breast cancer.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Spatial transcriptome reveals histology-correlated immune signature learnt by deep learning attention mechanism on H&E-stained images for ovarian cancer prognosis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Early Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Integrating Histopathology with Artificial Intelligence.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estrogen receptor (ER) positivity by immunohistochemistry has long been a main selection criterium for breast cancer patients to be treated with endocrine therapy. However, ER positivity might not directly correlate with activated ER signaling activity, which is a better predictor for endocrine therapy responsiveness. In this study, we investigated if a deep learning method using whole-slide H&E-stained images could predict ER signaling activity. First, ER signaling activity score was determined using RNAseq data available from each of the 1082 breast cancer samples in the TCGA Pan-Cancer dataset based on the Hallmark Estrogen Response Early gene set from the Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB). Then the processed H&E-stained images and ER signaling activity scores from a training cohort were fed into ResNet101 with three additional fully connected layers to generate a predicted ER activity score. The trained models were subsequently applied to an independent testing cohort. The result demonstrated that ER + /HER2- breast cancer patients with a higher predicted ER activity score had longer progression-free survival (p = 0.0368) than those with lower predicted ER activity score. In conclusion, a convolutional deep neural network can predict prognosis and endocrine therapy response in breast cancer patients based on whole-slide H&E-stained images. The trained models were found to robustly predict the prognosis of ER + /HER2- patients. This information is valuable for patient management, as it does not require RNA-seq or microarray data analyses. Thus, these models can reduce the cost of the diagnosis workflow if such information is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.