Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38052746›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2024

Dopaminergic modulation of sensitivity to immediate and delayed punishment during decision-making.

Grace L Minnes, Anna J Wiener, Anna E Liley, Nicholas W Simon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Comprehensive 4-layeredCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. Sex differences in sensitivity to dopamine receptor manipulations of risk-based decision making in rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grace L MinnesDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Anna J WienerDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Anna E LileyDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Nicholas W SimonDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA. nwsimon@memphis.edu.
University of Memphis · US

Funding

Identifying the neurophysiological basis of risky decision-makingR15DA046797 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI SIMON, NICHOLAS W · 2019 to 2019
$396k
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA046797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective decision-making involves careful consideration of all rewarding and aversive outcomes. Importantly, negative outcomes often occur later in time, leading to underestimation, or "discounting," of these consequences. Despite the frequent occurrence of delayed outcomes, little is known about the neurobiology underlying sensitivity to delayed punishment during decision-making. The Delayed Punishment Decision-making Task (DPDT) addresses this by assessing sensitivity to delayed versus immediate punishment in rats. Rats initially avoid punished reinforcers, then select this option more frequently when delay precedes punishment. We used DPDT to examine effects of acute systemic administration of catecholaminergic drugs on sensitivity to delayed punishment in male and female adult rats. Cocaine did not affect choice of rewards with immediate punishment but caused a dose-dependent reduction in choice of delayed punishment. Neither activation nor blockade of D1-like dopamine receptor affected decision-making, but activation of D2-like dopamine receptors reduced choice of delayed punishment. D2 blockade did not attenuate cocaine's effects on decision-making, suggesting that cocaine's effects are not dependent on D2 receptor activation. Increasing synaptic norepinephrine via atomoxetine also reduced choice of delayed (but not immediate) punishment. Notably, when DPDT was modified from ascending to descending pre-punishment delays, these drugs did not affect choice of delayed or immediate punishment, although high-dose quinpirole impaired behavioral flexibility. In summary, sensitivity to delayed punishment is regulated by both dopamine and norepinephrine transmission in task-specific fashion. Understanding the neurochemical modulation of decision-making with delayed punishment is a critical step toward treating disorders characterized by aberrant sensitivity to negative consequences.

Indexed as

Atomoxetine HydrochlorideCocaineDecision MakingPunishmentAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAnimalsDopamineDopamine AgonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleMaleQuinpiroleRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCocaineDopamineDopamine AgonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsQuinpiroleReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Decision-makingDelay discountingDopamineNorepinephrinePunishment

Identifiers

PMID38052746
OpenAlexW4389334428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.