ArticleCMAJ open
Infants, children, youth and young adults with a serious illness in British Columbia: a population-based analysis using linked administrative data.
Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Specialist paediatric palliative care program development in the standard-of-care era.Paediatrics & child health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric palliative care aims to improve quality of life among infants, children, youth and young adults with serious illnesses, sometimes over years, but estimates of infants, children, youth and young adults requiring pediatric palliative care have been highly variable and need refinement. We sought to describe this population in British Columbia and identify clinical instability to inform program planning in pediatric palliative care.
methodsWe conducted a population-based analysis using linked administrative health data from 2012/13 to 2016/17. We applied a coding framework validated in the United Kingdom to estimate the number of BC residents aged 0-25 years with serious illnesses and to identify 5 clinical stages. We describe demographics, estimate prevalence and model risk of instability, defined as having urgent hospital admissions, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.
resultsAbout 2500 infants, children, youth and young adults were admitted to hospital with a serious illness diagnosis each study year, of which around 50% were infants, 60% or so of whom had perinatal or congenital diagnoses. Compared with children aged 1-4 years, infants had the highest risk of instability (odds ratio [OR] 6.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.97-7.29). Compared with oncology patients, infants, children, youth and young adults with neurological (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.21-1.70) and otherwise specified diagnoses (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.39-1.73) had a higher risk of instability.
interpretationThe population of infants, children, youth and young adults with serious illnesses in BC is substantially larger than that currently receiving pediatric palliative care. Future planning of these services needs to consider expanding its reach, focusing particularly on infants and other subpopulations with high risk of instability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.