Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38052472›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2023

How to break bad news and how to learn this skill: results from an international North-Eastern German Society for Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO) survey among physicians and medical students with 1089 participants

Emilie M Herzog, Adak Pirmorady Sehouli, Jolijn Boer, Klaus Pietzner, Edgar Petru, Viola Heinzelmann, Eva Roser, Desislava Dimitrova, Gülten Oskay-Özcelik, Oumar Camara and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors influencing care for patients with gynecologic malignancies from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: a questionnaire study (iCALD-2).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Between Hope and Reality: The Art of Delivering Difficult News.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Emilie M HerzogDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0702-5050
Adak Pirmorady SehouliDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jolijn BoerNorth-Eastern German Society for Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO eV), Berlin, Germany.
Klaus PietznerDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Edgar PetruDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Viola HeinzelmannDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eva RoserDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-1595
Desislava DimitrovaDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gülten Oskay-ÖzcelikNorth-Eastern German Society for Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO eV), Berlin, Germany.
Oumar CamaraNorth-Eastern German Society for Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO eV), Berlin, Germany.
Jalid SehouliDepartment of Gynecology, Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany jalid.sehouli@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-6623
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DENord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie · DEMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelivering bad news to patients is one of the most challenging tasks in medical practice. Despite its great relevance to patients, relatives, and medical staff, there is a paucity of data pertaining to training, experience, expectations, and preferences of physicians and medical students on breaking bad news.

methodsWe conducted an international survey in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria using an online questionnaire among physicians and medical students.

resultsA total of 786 physicians and 303 medical students completed the survey. Physicians stated that 32.7% deliver bad news several times a week and 45.2% several times a month. Difficulties controlling their emotions (35.1%) and remaining professional (43.4%) were the greatest challenges for physicians. Delivering bad news is associated with feelings of anxiety, both among experienced physicians (median of 3.8 out of 10.0) and medical students (median of 5.3). Conveying bad news is a burden to physicians and consequently has a substantial impact on their job satisfaction. All participants reported the need for more communication training concerning this subject. Only 49.5% of medical students and 67.3% of physicians mentioned having learned adequate communication skills. Our data demonstrate that communication training decreases the level of anxiety and increases the feeling of self-confidence towards breaking bad news. Preferred educational tools were seminars with simulation (students: 71.4%, physicians: 49.5%), observing more senior faculty (students: 57.4%, physicians: 55.1%), and supervision and feedback sessions (students: 36.3%, physicians: 45.7%). The largest barriers regarding education on communication were limited time (students: 77.0%, physicians: 74.9%) and missing awareness of supervisors (students: 60.6%, physicians: 41.1%).

conclusionsOur study showed a great need for systematic training and education in breaking bad news among physicians and medical students. Hospitals, medical schools, and postgraduate training programs are strongly encouraged to fill this gap, and improve sustainable doctor-patient communication to overcome the psychological burden for physicians.

Indexed as

PhysiciansStudents, MedicalCommunicationHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesTruth DisclosureCross-Sectional StudiesQuality of Life (PRO)/Palliative Care

Identifiers

PMID38052472
PMCPMC10804030
OpenAlexW4389343697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.