Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38052443›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Infants' visual perception without feature-binding.

Shuma Tsurumi, So Kanazawa, Masami K Yamaguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuma TsurumiDepartment of Psychology, Hokkaido University, N10 W7, Kita, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-1973
So KanazawaDepartment of Psychology, Japan Women's University, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8681, Japan.
Masami K YamaguchiDepartment of Psychology, Chuo University, 742-1 Higashi-Nakano, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0393, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reveal a unique visual perception before feature-integration of colour and motion in infants. Visual perception is established by the integration of multiple features, such as colour and motion direction. The mechanism of feature integration benefits from the ongoing interplay between feedforward and feedback loops, yet our comprehension of this causal connection remains incomplete. Researchers have explored the role of recurrent processing in feature integration by studying a visual illusion called 'misbinding', wherein visual characteristics are erroneously merged, resulting in a perception distinct from the originally presented stimuli. Anatomical investigations have revealed that the neural pathways responsible for recurrent connections are underdeveloped in early infants. Therefore, there is a possibility that younger infants could potentially perceive the physically presented visual information that adults miss due to misbinding. Here, we demonstrate that infants less than half a year old showed no misbinding; thus, they perceived the physically presented visual information, while infants more than half a year old perceived incorrectly integrated visual information, showing misbinding. Our findings indicate that recurrent processing barely functions in infants younger than six months of age and that visual information that should have been originally integrated is perceived as it is without being integrated.

Indexed as

IllusionsMotion PerceptionAdultHumansInfantVisual Perceptiondevelopmentfeature-integrationfeedback processinginfants

Identifiers

PMID38052443
PMCPMC10697795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.