ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2024
Topical section: embryonic models (2023) for Current Opinion in Genetics & Development.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- YAP1 and QSER1 are key modulators of embryonic signaling pathways in the mammalian epiblast.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Efficient stem cell-derived mouse embryo models for environmental studies.Developmental cell · 2026Article
- A continuous totipotent-like cell-based embryo model recapitulates mouse embryogenesis from zygotic genome activation to gastrulation.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Stem cell-based human embryo models: current knowledge and open questions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- YAP1 and QSER1 are Key Modulators of Embryonic Signaling Pathways in the Mammalian Epiblast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Manipulating cell fate through reprogramming: approaches and applications.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem cell-based mammalian embryo models facilitate the discovery of developmental mechanisms because they are more amenable to genetic and epigenetic perturbations than natural embryos. Here, we highlight exciting recent advances that have yielded a plethora of models of embryonic development. Imperfections in these models highlight gaps in our current understanding and outline future research directions, ushering in an exciting new era for embryology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.