ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023
Substitution Errors and the Role of Markedness in Bilingual Phonological Acquisition.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling the Bilingual Phonological Idiolect Through a Translanguaging Lens.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Article
- Introduction to the Research Symposium on Bilingualism Forum.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Reframing Bilingual Acquisition and Theory: An Insider Perspective Through a Translanguaging Lens.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to (a) provide evidence for a theoretical model of between-language interaction in bilingual phonological production through the examination of substitution error patterns and to (b) provide developmental data on bilingual children with and without speech sound impairments for use in clinical assessment and diagnosis. Through the lens of markedness, or relative featural complexity, patterns of between-language interaction were observed to provide a foundation for clinical decision making in phonological assessment.
methodSeventy children, ages 3;11-6;7 (years; months), participated in this study: 63 typically developing bilingual Spanish-English-speaking children (x¯ = 5;2) and seven bilingual Spanish-English-speaking children with speech sound impairments (x¯ = 4;6). Substitution errors in single-word speech samples were analyzed in relation to their language-specific markedness values in terms of both targets avoided and substitutes produced. Both quantitative and descriptive analyses of substitution errors were performed.
resultsBilingual children, regardless of impairment status, abided by the phonological rules of their languages in English and Spanish productions. Findings indicated both typically developing children and children with speech sound impairments preferred the use of unmarked sounds that are shared across languages over the use of marked, language-specific sounds.
conclusionsThrough the examination of substitution errors, evidence of between-language interaction and recognition of relative complexity emerged. These results have implications for clinical assessment and diagnosis of speech sound impairments in bilingual children. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL AND PRESENTATION VIDEO: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24640200.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.