ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Polarizable AMOEBA Model for Simulating Mg
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional and structural basis of a hypermorphic TRPC3 variant.Science advances · 2026Article
- Physical Confinement Modulates the Rate-Limiting Transition in the Release of Phosphate from Actin Filaments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Alteration of the Lipid Bilayer Structure by MgLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- Ion Pairing and Solvent Shell Polarization in Aqueous Solutions of Divalent Metal Sulfates.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Advancing Non-Atom-Centered Basis Methods for More Accurate Interaction Energies: Benchmarks and Large-Scale Applications.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
- Balancing Group I Monatomic Ion-Polar Compound Interactions for Condensed Phase Simulation in the Polarizable Drude Force Field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular mechanics (MM) simulations have the potential to provide detailed insights into the mechanisms of enzymes that utilize nucleotides as cofactors. In most cases, the activities of these enzymes also require the binding of divalent cations to catalytic sites. However, modeling divalent cations in MM simulations has been challenging. The inclusion of explicit polarization was considered promising, but despite improvements over nonpolarizable force fields and despite the inclusion of "Nonbonded-fix (NB-fix)" corrections, errors in interaction energies of divalent cations with proteins remain large. Importantly, the application of these models fails to reproduce the experimental structural data on Mg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.