ArticlePhysical therapy2024
The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia Is Reliable and Valid in the Telehealth Setting for Patients With Cerebellar Ataxia.
Article in Physical therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebellar reaching ataxia is exacerbated by timing demands and assistive interaction torques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a live e-version.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHealth care has increasingly expanded into a hybrid in-person/telehealth model. Patients with a variety of health conditions, including cerebellar ataxia, have received virtual health evaluations; however, it remains unknown whether some outcome measures that clinicians utilize in the telehealth setting are reliable and valid. The goal of this project is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) for patients with cerebellar ataxia in the telehealth setting.
methodsNineteen individuals with cerebellar impairments were recruited on a voluntary basis. Participants completed 2 30-minute testing sessions during which a clinical examination and the SARA were performed. One session was performed in person, and the other session was assessed remotely. Outcome measure performance was video recorded in both environments and independently scored by 4 additional raters with varying levels of clinical experience (ranging from 6 months to 29 years). Concurrent validity was assessed with the Spearman rank order correlation coefficient (α < .05), comparing the virtual SARA scores to their gold standard in-person scores. Interrater reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,4) (α < .05).
resultsFourteen of the 19 participants completed both in-person and telehealth SARA evaluations. We found that the in-person SARA and the telehealth SARA have large concurrent validity (Spearman rho significant at the 2-tailed α of .01 = 0.90; n = 14). Additionally, raters of varying years of experience had excellent interrater reliability for both the in-person SARA (ICC [2,4] = 0.97; n = 19) and the telehealth SARA (ICC [2,4] = 0.98; n = 14).
conclusionOur results show that the telehealth SARA is comparable to the in-person SARA. Additionally, raters of varying years of clinical experience were found to have excellent interrater reliability scores for both remote and in-person SARA evaluations. IMPACT: Our study shows that the SARA can be used in the telehealth setting for patients with ataxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.