Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38051586›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2024

The effect of extracellular matrix on the precision medicine utility of pancreatic cancer patient-derived organoids.

Jan C Lumibao, Shira R Okhovat, Kristina L Peck, Xiaoxue Lin, Kathryn Lande, Shira Yomtoubian, Isabella Ng, Hervé Tiriac, Andrew M Lowy, Jingjing Zou and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan C LumibaoSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Shira R OkhovatSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Kristina L PeckSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Xiaoxue LinSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Kathryn LandeSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Shira YomtoubianSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Isabella NgDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Hervé TiriacDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Andrew M LowyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Moores Cancer Center, and.
Jingjing ZouDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, UCSD, San Diego, California, USA.
Dannielle D EngleSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Reuben Shaw · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Project 3: The AMPK Autophagy Pathway as a Metabolic Liability in Pancratic Ductal AdenocarcinomaP01CA265762 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI TONY R. HUNTER · 2023 to 2026
$14.6M
San Diego Digestive Diseases Research CenterP30DK120515 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Bernd G. Schnabl · 2019 to 2026
$10.8M
Salk Institute Cancer Training GrantT32CA009370 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Diana Clare Hargreaves, Jan Karlseder · 1986 to 2026
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA265762NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS R00 CA024725NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009370NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK120515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) to characterize therapeutic sensitivity and resistance is a promising precision medicine approach, and its potential to inform clinical decisions is now being tested in several large multiinstitutional clinical trials. PDOs are cultivated in the extracellular matrix from basement membrane extracts (BMEs) that are most commonly acquired commercially. Each clinical site utilizes distinct BME lots and may be restricted due to the availability of commercial BME sources. However, the effect of different sources of BMEs on organoid drug response is unknown. Here, we tested the effect of BME source on proliferation, drug response, and gene expression in mouse and human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) organoids. Both human and mouse organoids displayed increased proliferation in Matrigel compared with Cultrex and UltiMatrix. However, we observed no substantial effect on drug response when organoids were cultured in Matrigel, Cultrex, or UltiMatrix. We also did not observe major shifts in gene expression across the different BME sources, and PDOs maintained their classical or basal-like designation. Overall, we found that the BME source (Matrigel, Cultrex, UltiMatrix) does not shift PDO dose-response curves or drug testing results, indicating that PDO pharmacotyping is a robust approach for precision medicine.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansMiceOrganoidsPrecision MedicineCancerCell BiologyDrug therapyExtracellular matrixOncology

Identifiers

PMID38051586
PMCPMC10906458
OpenAlexW4389334451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.