Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38051574›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2023

Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study.

Kimberly Peven, Aidan P Wickham, Octavia Wilks, Yusuf C Kaplan, Andrei Marhol, Saddif Ahmed, Ryan Bamford, Adam C Cunningham, Carley Prentice, András Meczner and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kimberly PevenFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-4084
Aidan P WickhamFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-059X
Octavia WilksFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-4627
Yusuf C KaplanFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-7934
Andrei MarholFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-2593
Saddif AhmedFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-0899
Ryan BamfordFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-3782
Adam C CunninghamFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9791-7813
Carley PrenticeFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-1388
András MecznerYour.MD Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8136-7768
Matthew FenechUna Health GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9970-0215
Stephen GilbertElse Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1997-1689
Anna KlepchukovaFlo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3035-3267
Sonia Ponzo *Flo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-5078
Liudmila Zhaunova *Flo Health UK Limited, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-1898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReproductive health conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affect a large proportion of women and people who menstruate worldwide. Prevalence estimates for these conditions range from 5% to 40% of women of reproductive age. Long diagnostic delays, up to 12 years, are common and contribute to health complications and increased health care costs. Symptom checker apps provide users with information and tools to better understand their symptoms and thus have the potential to reduce the time to diagnosis for reproductive health conditions.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the agreement between clinicians and 3 symptom checkers (developed by Flo Health UK Limited) in assessing symptoms of endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and PCOS using vignettes. We also aimed to present a robust example of vignette case creation, review, and classification in the context of predeployment testing and validation of digital health symptom checker tools.

methodsIndependent general practitioners were recruited to create clinical case vignettes of simulated users for the purpose of testing each condition symptom checker; vignettes created for each condition contained a mixture of condition-positive and condition-negative outcomes. A second panel of general practitioners then reviewed, approved, and modified (if necessary) each vignette. A third group of general practitioners reviewed each vignette case and designated a final classification. Vignettes were then entered into the symptom checkers by a fourth, different group of general practitioners. The outcomes of each symptom checker were then compared with the final classification of each vignette to produce accuracy metrics including percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

resultsA total of 24 cases were created per condition. Overall, exact matches between the vignette general practitioner classification and the symptom checker outcome were 83% (n=20) for endometriosis, 83% (n=20) for uterine fibroids, and 88% (n=21) for PCOS. For each symptom checker, sensitivity was reported as 81.8% for endometriosis, 84.6% for uterine fibroids, and 100% for PCOS; specificity was reported as 84.6% for endometriosis, 81.8% for uterine fibroids, and 75% for PCOS; positive predictive value was reported as 81.8% for endometriosis, 84.6% for uterine fibroids, 80% for PCOS; and negative predictive value was reported as 84.6% for endometriosis, 81.8% for uterine fibroids, and 100% for PCOS.

conclusionsThe single-condition symptom checkers have high levels of agreement with general practitioner classification for endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and PCOS. Given long delays in diagnosis for many reproductive health conditions, which lead to increased medical costs and potential health complications for individuals and health care providers, innovative health apps and symptom checkers hold the potential to improve care pathways.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLeiomyomaFemaleHumansPrevalenceReproductive Healthaccuracychatbotclinical vignettesdigital healthdigital health tooleHealth appsendometriosisgynecologymHealthmobile healthmobile health appmobile phonepolycystic ovary syndromesymptom checkersymptom checkersuterineuterine fibroidsuterusvignetteswomen's health

Identifiers

PMID38051574
PMCPMC10731551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.