Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38051461›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024

Deep learning approach for discrimination of liver lesions using nine time-phase images of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Naohisa Kamiyama, Katsutoshi Sugimoto, Ryuichi Nakahara, Tatsuya Kakegawa, Takao Itoi

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naohisa KamiyamaUltrasound General Imaging, GE HealthCare Japan, 127 Asahigaoka-4, Hino, Tokyo, 191-0065, Japan. naohisa.kamiyama@ge.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-8150
Katsutoshi SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Ryuichi NakaharaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Tatsuya KakegawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Takao ItoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JPGeneral Electric (Spain) · ESOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows different enhancement patterns depending on the time after administration of the contrast agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of liver nodule characterization using our proposed deep learning model with input of nine CEUS images.

methodsA total of 181 liver lesions (48 benign, 78 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 55 non-HCC malignant) were included in this prospective study. CEUS were performed using the contrast agent Sonazoid, and in addition to B-mode images before injection, image clips were stored every minute up to 10 min. A deep learning model was developed by arranging three ResNet50 transfer learning models in parallel. This proposed model allowed inputting up to nine datasets of different phases of CEUS and performing image augmentation of nine images synchronously. Using the results, the correct prediction rate, sensitivity, and specificity between "benign" and "malignant" cases were analyzed for each combination of the time phase. These accuracy values were also compared with the washout score judged by a human.

resultsThe proposed model showed performance superior to the referential standard model when the dataset from B-mode to the 10-min images were used (sensitivity: 93.2%, specificity: 65.3%, average correct answer rate: 60.1%). It also maintained 90.2% sensitivity and 61.2% specificity even when the dataset was limited to 2 min after injection, and this accuracy was equivalent to or better than human scoring by experts.

conclusionOur proposed model has the potential to identify tumor types earlier than the Kupffer phase, but at the same time, machine learning confirmed that Kupffer-phase Sonazoid images contain essential information for the classification of liver nodules.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningFerric CompoundsIronLiver NeoplasmsOxidesContrast MediaHumansImage EnhancementProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyContrast MediaFerric CompoundsIronOxidesSonazoidContrast-enhanced ultrasonographyHepatocellular carcinomaMachine learningMulti-input deep learning model

Identifiers

PMID38051461
PMCPMC12000262
OpenAlexW4389338978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.