ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Measurement of tibial slope using biplanar stereoradiography (EOS®).
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of posterior tibial slope measurements: Accuracy and reliability of radiographs and CT.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPosterior tibial slope (PTS) is an important anatomic parameter of the knee related to anteroposterior instability. Biplanar stereoradiography allows for simultaneous low-dose acquisition of anteroposterior and lateral views with 3D capability, enabling separate lateral and medial plateau analyses. We aimed to evaluate the possibility and compare the reproducibility of measuring medial and lateral PTS on EOS® images with two different patient positionings and compare it with CT of the knees as the gold standard.
methodsThis is a retrospective study including volunteers who underwent lower limb stereoradiography and knee CT from 01/08/2016 to 07/31/2019. Sixty legs from 30 patients were studied. PTS were measured using stereoradiography and CT by two radiologists. Intraclass correlation was used to calculate intrarater and interrater reproducibilities. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to calculate the correlation between stereoradiography and CT. We also compared the reproducibility of the stereoradiography of volunteers with 2 different positionings.
resultsThe mean stereoradiography PTS values for right and left knees were as follows: lateral, 12.2° (SD: 4.1) and 10.1° (SD: 3.5); medial,12.2° (SD: 4.4) and 11.6° (SD: 3.9). CT PTS mean values for right and left knee are as follows: lateral, 10.3° (SD:2.5) and 10.6° (SD: 2.8); medial: 8.7° (SD: 3.7) and 10.4° (SD: 3.5). Agreement between CT and EOS for angles between lateral and medial PTS was good (right, 0.874; left, 0.871). Regarding patient positioning on stereoradiography, interrater and intrarater reproducibilities were greater for patients with nonparallel feet (0.738-0.883 and 0.870-0.975).
conclusionsStereoradiography allows for appropriate delineation of tibial plateaus, especially in patients with nonparallel feet, for the purpose of measuring PTS. The main advantage is lower radiation doses compared to radiography and CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.