Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38051421›Full record

ReviewScience and engineering ethics2023

Pedagogical Orientations and Evolving Responsibilities of Technological Universities: A Literature Review of the History of Engineering Education.

Diana Adela Martin, Gunter Bombaerts, Maja Horst, Kyriaki Papageorgiou, Gianluigi Viscusi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science and engineering ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana Adela MartinPhilosophy and Ethics, Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. diana.martin@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-4100
Gunter BombaertsPhilosophy and Ethics, Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8006-1617
Maja HorstFaculty of Arts, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-5213
Kyriaki PapageorgiouFusion Point, Esade Business and Law School, Barcelona, Spain.
Gianluigi ViscusiBusiness School, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-7108

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Innovative Europe Grant Agreement 788359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current societal changes and challenges demand a broader role of technological universities, thus opening the question of how their role evolved over time and how to frame their current responsibility. In response to urgent calls for debating and redefining the identity of contemporary technological universities, this paper has two aims. The first aim is to identify the key characteristics and orientations marking the development of technological universities, as recorded in the history of engineering education. The second aim is to articulate the responsibility of contemporary technological universities given their different orientations and characteristics. For this, we first provide a non-systematic literature review of the key pedagogical orientations of technological universities, grounded in the history of engineering education. The five major orientations of technological universities presented in the paper are technical, economic, social, political, and ecological. We then use this historical survey to articulate the responsibilities of contemporary technological universities reflecting the different orientations. Technological universities can promote and foster the development of scientific, professional, civic, legal, or intra- and inter- generational responsibility. We argue that responsibility is not specific to any particular orientation, such that the concept is broadened to complement each orientation or mix of orientations of a technological university. Our contribution thus serves as a call for technological universities to self-reflect on their mission and identity, by offering a lens for identifying the orientations they currently foster and making explicit the responsibility arising from their current orientation or the ones they strive to cultivate.

Indexed as

EngineeringTechnologyCurriculumHumansSocial BehaviorSocial ResponsibilityUniversitiesEngineering ethics educationHistory of engineering educationInstitutional responsibilityLiterature reviewResponsibility of technological universitiesSocietal responsibilityValues of technological universities

Identifiers

PMID38051421
PMCPMC10698075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.