ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024
Clinical and Pathologic Predictors of Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Independent prognostic value of tumor deposits in stage III colorectal cancer: a large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Micro-Computed Tomography Whole-Block Imaging Reveals Origin and Path of Rectal Cancer Tumor Deposits: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluating the prognostic value of tumor deposits in non-metastatic lymph node-positive colon adenocarcinoma using Cox regression and machine learning.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor deposits (TDs) are a special metastatic pattern of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to explore the pathological characteristics of TD and find out the risk factors of TD in CRC.
methodsTDs cases of CRC were selected and validated by HE staining. The correlation between TDs and T stages, N stages, and microsatellite instability was calculated by the chi-squared (χ
resultsA total of 2553 patients with colorectal cancer undergoing intestinal resection were included in this study. Two hundred fifty-nine cases of TDs patients were included. The positive rate of TDs was 1.9% (2/105) in T1, 3.8% (10/266) in T2, 11% (231/2305) in T3, and 22.8% (16/77) in T4. T3 and T4 were more prone to TDs than T1 and T2, but there was no difference between T3 and T4. The positive rate of TDs was 7.2% (107/1491) in N0, 14.3% (152/1062) in N + , and N + was more prone to TDs than N0. The positive rate of TDs was 10.5% (256/2432) in MSS, 2.5% (3/121) in MSI, and MSS was more prone to TDs than MSI. Multivariate analysis showed lymph node invasion, T stage, and MSS were independent risk factors for TDs.
conclusionLymph node invasion, T stage, and MSS were independent risk factors for TDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.