Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38051372›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Endometriosis: patient-doctor communication and psychological counselling.

Tewes Wischmann, Beate Ditzen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Metabolomics for the identification of biomarkers in endometriosis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
  4. Psychological aspects of infertility.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tewes WischmannInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. tewes.wischmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7837-0138
Beate DitzenInstitute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Bergheimer Str. 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fact that endometriosis is one of the most frequent gynaecological disorders in women and girls is gradually attracting greater public and political attention. There is also substantial awareness of the disorder among German gynaecologists, albeit without sufficient "equipment" for discussing the condition with patients and providing psychological counselling. This article offers hands-on proposals for medical counselling and the discussion of relevant issues, as well as other practical tips and suggested verbalisations for use by women suffering from endometriosis (and their partners). These practical recommendations will certainly help to improve the doctor-patient relationship in the case of endometriosis. The resources mentioned below (guidebooks, websites) focus on German-language offerings only.

Indexed as

EndometriosisCommunicationCounselingFemaleHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsCouple relationsEndometriosisInfertilityPatient–doctor communicationPsychosomaticsSexualityTrauma

Identifiers

PMID38051372
PMCPMC10808148
OpenAlexW4389348550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.