Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38051365›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2024

Antibiofilm activity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles against the biofilm associated infections.

Moumita Sil, Dipro Mukherjee, Arunava Goswami, Moupriya Nag, Dibyajit Lahiri, Debasmita Bhattacharya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Moumita SilDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, India.
Dipro MukherjeeAgricultural and Ecological Research Unit, Biological Sciences Division, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.
Arunava GoswamiDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, India.
Moupriya NagDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, New Town, University of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, India.
Dibyajit LahiriDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, New Town, University of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, India. dibyajit.lahiri@uem.edu.in.
Debasmita BhattacharyaDepartment of Basic Science and Humanities, Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, Salt Lake, University of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, India.
University of Engineering & Management · INIndian Institute of Technology Jodhpur · INIndian Statistical Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pharmaceutical industries, various chemical carriers are present which are used for drug delivery to the correct target sites. The most popular and upcoming drug delivery carriers are mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN). The main reason for its popularity is its ability to be specific and optimize the drug delivery process in a controlled manner. Nowadays, MSNs are widely used to eradicate various microbial infections, especially the ones related to biofilms. Biofilms are sessile groups of cells that live by forming a consortium and exhibit antibacterial resistance (AMR). They exhibit AMR by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and various quorum sensing (QS) signaling molecules. Usually, bacterial and fungal cells are capable of forming biofilms. These biofilms are pathogenic. In the majority of the cases, biofilms cause nosocomial diseases. This review will focus on the antibiofilm activities of MSN, its mechanism of target-specific drug delivery, and its ability to disrupt the bacterial biofilms inhibiting the infection. The review will also discuss various mechanisms for the delivery of pharmaceutical molecules by the MSNs to inhibit the bacterial biofilms, and lastly, we will talk about the different types of MSNs and their antibiofilm activities.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsNanoparticlesSilicon DioxideAnimalsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansPorosityQuorum SensingAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug CarriersSilicon DioxideAntimicrobial resistance (AMR)BiofilmsExtracellular polymeric substances (EPS)Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN)Quorum sensing (QS)

Identifiers

PMID38051365
OpenAlexW4389329818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.