Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050684›Full record

ArticleACS applied bio materials2023

3D-Printed Collagen-Nanocellulose Hybrid Bioscaffolds with Tailored Properties for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Andreja Dobaj Štiglic, Florian Lackner, Chandran Nagaraj, Marco Beaumont, Matej Bračič, Isabel Duarte, Veno Kononenko, Damjana Drobne, Balaraman Madhan, Matjaž Finšgar and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of cellulose and its derivatives for 3D printing of bone tissue scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Scaffolds Bioink for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Andreja Dobaj ŠtiglicFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Florian LacknerInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Biobased System (IBioSys), Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 9, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Chandran NagarajLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Vascular Research, Stiftingtalstrasse 24, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Marco BeaumontDepartment of Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry o Renewable Resources, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), A-3430 Tulln, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2571-497X
Matej BračičFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Isabel DuarteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation (TEMA), Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory (LASI), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Veno KononenkoDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, Večna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Damjana DrobneDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, Večna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Balaraman MadhanCSIR-Central Leather Research Institute, Chennai 600 020, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4198-8452
Matjaž FinšgarFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry and Industrial Analysis, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-9284
Rupert KarglFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4327-7053
Karin Stana KleinschekInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Biobased System (IBioSys), Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 9, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9189-0242
Tamilselvan MohanFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8569-1642
University of Maribor · SIBiotechnical Educational Centre Ljubljana · SIBOKU University · ATCentral Leather Research Institute · INGraz University of Technology · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Vascular Research · ATUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid collagen (Coll) bioscaffolds have emerged as a promising solution for tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine. These innovative bioscaffolds combine the beneficial properties of Coll, an important structural protein of the extracellular matrix, with various other biomaterials to create platforms for long-term cell growth and tissue formation. The integration or cross-linking of Coll with other biomaterials increases mechanical strength and stability and introduces tailored biochemical and physical factors that mimic the natural tissue microenvironment. This work reports on the fabrication of chemically cross-linked hybrid bioscaffolds with enhanced properties from the combination of Coll, nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and citric acid (CA). The bioscaffolds were prepared by 3D printing ink containing Coll-NFC-CMC-CA followed by freeze-drying, dehydrothermal treatment, and neutralization. Cross-linking through the formation of ester bonds between the polymers and CA in the bioscaffolds was achieved by exposing the bioscaffolds to elevated temperatures in the dry state. The morphology, pores/porosity, chemical composition, structure, thermal behavior, swelling, degradation, and mechanical properties of the bioscaffolds in the dry and wet states were investigated as a function of Coll concentration. The bioscaffolds showed no cytotoxicity to MG-63 human bone osteosarcoma cells as tested by different assays measuring different end points. Overall, the presented hybrid Coll bioscaffolds offer a unique combination of biocompatibility, stability, and structural support, making them valuable tools for TE.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCelluloseCollagenHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalBiocompatible MaterialsCelluloseCollagen3D printingcarboxymethyl cellulosecitric acidcollagencross-linkinghybrid scaffoldsnanofibrillated cellulose

Identifiers

PMID38050684
PMCPMC10731651
OpenAlexW4389346321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.