Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050658›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2024

Clinical phenotypes of cardiogenic shock survivors: insights into late host responses and long-term outcomes.

Sabri Soussi, Mojtaba Ahmadiankalati, Jacob C Jentzer, John C Marshall, Patrick R Lawler, Margaret Herridge, Alexandre Mebazaa, Etienne Gayat, Zihang Lu, Claudia C Dos Santos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Invasive ventilation and association with outcomes in heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Profiling of Cardiogenic Shock: Incorporating Machine Learning Into Bedside Management.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  7. Why Molecular Subphenotyping Is Needed in Cardiogenic Shock and How to Accomplish This.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Predictors of acute kidney injury among octogenarians undergoing open mitral valve repair.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabri SoussiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mojtaba AhmadiankalatiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Jacob C JentzerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
John C MarshallInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, St Michael's Hospital, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 36 Queen St E, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Patrick R LawlerMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Margaret HerridgeDepartment of Medicine, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Toronto General Research Institute, Institute of Medical Science, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexandre MebazaaInserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Etienne GayatInserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Zihang LuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Claudia C Dos SantosInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, St Michael's Hospital, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 36 Queen St E, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
French and European Outcome Registry in Intensive Care Units (FROG‐ICU) and CCCTBG trans‐trial group study for InFACT – the International Forum for Acute Care Trialists
University of Toronto · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity Health Network · CADélégation Paris 5 · FRInserm · FRMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Programme Hospitalier de la Recherche Clinique AON 10-216Société Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAn elevated risk of adverse events persists for years in cardiogenic shock (CS) survivors with high mortality rate and physical/mental disability. This study aims to link clinical CS-survivor phenotypes with distinct late host-response patterns at intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and long-term outcomes using model-based clustering. METHODS AND

resultsIn the original prospective, observational, international French and European Outcome Registry in Intensive Care Units (FROG-ICU) study, ICU patients with CS on admission were identified (N = 228). Among them, 173 were discharged alive from the ICU and included in the current study. Latent class analysis was applied to identify distinct CS-survivor phenotypes at ICU discharge using 15 readily available clinical and laboratory variables. The primary endpoint was 1 year of mortality after ICU discharge. Secondary endpoints were readmission and physical/mental disability [short form-36 questionnaire (SF-36) score] within 1 year after ICU discharge. Two distinct phenotypes at ICU discharge were identified (A and B). Patients in Phenotype B (38%) were more anaemic and had higher circulating levels of lactate, sustained kidney injury, and persistent elevation in plasma markers of inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction compared with Phenotype A. They had also a higher rate of non-ischaemic origin of CS and right ventricular dysfunction on admission. CS survivors in Phenotype B had higher 1 year of mortality compared with Phenotype A (P = 0.045, Kaplan-Meier analysis). When adjusted for traditional risk factors (i.e. age, severity of illness, and duration of ICU stay), Phenotype B was independently associated with 1 year of mortality [adjusted hazard ratio = 2.83 (95% confidence interval 1.21-6.60); P = 0.016]. There was a significantly lower physical quality of life in Phenotype B patients at 3 months (i.e. SF-36 physical component score).

conclusionsA phenotype with sustained inflammation, myocardial fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction at ICU discharge was identified from readily available data and was independently associated with poor long-term outcomes in CS survivors.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeShock, CardiogenicFibrosisHumansInflammationPhenotypeProspective StudiesSurvivorsBiomarkersCardiogenic shockLatent profile analysisPost‐ICU outcomesPost intensive care syndrome (PICS)Precision medicinePredictive enrichmentPrognostic enrichment

Identifiers

PMID38050658
PMCPMC10966268
OpenAlexW4389342333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.