ReviewBasic and clinical neuroscience
Advances in Management of Spinal Cord Injury Using Stem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Review Study.
Review in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on Biomaterial Scaffolds Carrying Stem Cells for Inflammation Regulation After Spinal Cord Injury.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Advanced Biomaterial Delivery of Hypoxia-Conditioned Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) as a Therapeutic Platform for Traumatic Brain Injury.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Traumatic spinal cord injury: a review of the current state of art and future directions - what do we know and where are we going?North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Decellularized tissue matrices hydrogels functionalized with extracellular vesicles promote macrophage reprogramming and neural stem cell differentiation for spinal cord injury repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Exosomes as promising bioactive materials in the treatment of spinal cord injury.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- The Current Update of Conventional and Innovative Treatment Strategies for Central Nervous System Injury.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is characterized by serious both motor and sensory disability of the limbs below the injured segment. It is the most traumatic disorder among central nervous system (CNS) conditions which not only leads to psychological and physical harm to patients but also results in a dramatic loss in the life quality. Many efforts have been developed to find a therapeutic approach for SCI; however, an effective treatment has not yet been found. The lack of effective treatment approach and rehabilitation of SCI underscores the need to identify novel approaches. Tissue engineering associated with stem cells has been recently introduced as an effective treatment approaches for traumatic SCI. Although, low survival rates, immune rejection, cell dedifferentiation, and tumorigenicity have been addressed for tissue engineering. Regenerative medicine is an interdisciplinary field developing and applying tissue engineering, stem cell (SC) therapy, and SC-derived extracellular vesicle therapy that aims to provide reliable and safe ways to replace injured tissues and organs. The application of mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) has recently attracted attention to improve central nervous system dysfunction such as SCI, mainly by promoting neurogenesis and angiogenesis. Methods: In this review article the latest information of SCI improvement using stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles published data in the Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Pub Med databases were collected. Results: The data collected show that MSC-EVs, including exosomes, alone or in combination with scaffolds can can regenerate the injured nerve in SCI. Conclusion: This study summarizes the efficacy of MSC-EVs, including exosomes, alone or in combination with scaffolds in the treatment of SCI and then discusses the therapeutic outcomes observed in SCI experimental models following treatment with MSC-EVs alone or loaded on scaffolds in particular collagen-based scaffolds. Highlights: The pathological process of SCI being very complex.A complete effective strategy has yet to be found for treatment of SCI in human.Exosomes derived-stem cells alone have great potential for the treatment of SCI.Various biocompatible scaffolds are good drug carriers for SCI treatment.Various biocompatible scaffolds are good carriers for exosomes. Plain Language Summary: Human with spinal cord injury (SCI) show serious motor and sensory disability of the limbs. Since there is no an effective treatment for SCI, researchers are trying to develop and find a new therapeutic approach for SCI. CNS tissue engineering with various stem cells sources as well as their derived extracellular vesicle has been extensively attracted for providing reliable and safe approach for SCI treatment. Extracellular vesicles are lipid bilayer membrane-enclosed organelles containing various biomolecules involved in a variety of complex intercellular communication systems. They are released from all cell types into their surrounding environment and are important vehicles for paracrine The application of stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) has recently attracted attention to improve central nervous system dysfunction such as SCI, mainly by promoting neurogenesis and angiogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.