Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050181›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2025

Effect of sweet flavouring on the rewarding and reinforcing value of cigarillo use among young adults.

Janet Audrain-McGovern, Divya Manikandan, Fodie Koita, Olivia Klapec, Wallace B Pickworth, Matthew D Stone

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05092919 (The Effect of Sweet Flavoring on the Rewarding and Reinforcing Value of Cigarillo Use Among Young Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05092919 early_phase1completednot on this map

The Effect of Sweet Flavoring on the Rewarding and Reinforcing Value of Cigarillo Use Among Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled95ConditionsTobacco Use, Cigar SmokingArmsFlavor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janet Audrain-McGovernDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA audrain@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-5854
Divya ManikandanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fodie KoitaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Olivia KlapecDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Wallace B PickworthBattelle Center for Public Health Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Matthew D StoneHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1152-0621

Funding

The effect of sweet flavoring on the rewarding and reinforcing value of cigarillo use among young adultsR21DA050789 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AUDRAIN-MCGOVERN, JANET E · 2021 to 2022
$447k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA050789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCigarillos dominate the US cigar market, and young adults largely drive use. While young adults prefer flavoured to non-flavoured cigarillos, especially those flavoured to taste like fruit or other sweets, the factors that underlie this preference have received little attention. We sought to determine if key indicators of abuse liability, the rewarding and reinforcing effects, are greater for sweet versus non-flavoured cigarillos.

methodsYoung adults (18-24 years old) completed three laboratory visits assessing the subjective rewarding value (exposure paradigm), relative reinforcing value (computerised choice task) and absolute reinforcing value (ad libitum cigarillo smoking session) of sweet-flavoured versus non-flavoured cigarillos. General linear regression models were fit with the appropriate family link for each outcome measure.

resultsYoung adults rated sweet-flavoured cigarillos as more rewarding (estimated marginal mean (EMM) =4.52, 95% CI 4.00 to 5.03) than the non-flavoured cigarillo (EMM=3.31, 95% CI 2.80 to 3.83; B=1.20, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.60, p<0.001). The reinforcing value of sweet-flavoured cigarillos, measured by break point, was higher relative to non-flavoured cigarillos (6.34 out of 10), especially among young adults with a preference for flavoured cigarillos (B=1.94, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.18, p=0.003). Young adults took 1.9 times the number of puffs (35.75 vs 19.95) from sweet-flavoured cigarillos compared with non-flavoured cigarillos (Rate Ratio =1.94, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.90, p

conclusionsSweet flavouring increases the abuse liability of cigarillos among young adults as reflected in greater liking, motivation to use and actual use. Banning sweet flavouring in cigarillos may diminish their use in young adults.Trial registration number CT.gov (NCT05092919).

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSmokingSweetening AgentsTobacco ProductsAdolescentChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleTasteYoung AdultFlavoring AgentsSweetening AgentsAddictionNicotineNon-cigarette tobacco products

Identifiers

PMID38050181
PMCPMC11116272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.