Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050176›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Pre-saccadic Neural Enhancements in Marmoset Area MT.

Shanna H Coop, Jacob L Yates, Jude F Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Probing the limited oculomotor range of common marmosetsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Neural Recording Chambers for Long-Term Access to Brain Tissue.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Electrophysiology of Laminar Cortical Activity in the Common Marmoset.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shanna H CoopBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester 14627-0268, New York.
Jacob L YatesBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester 14627-0268, New York.
Jude F MitchellBrain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester 14627-0268, New York jude.francis.mitchell@gmail.com.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Neural basis of trans-saccadic perceptionR01EY030998 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MITCHELL, JUDE F · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Neural mechanisms of active vision in the foveaR00EY032179 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI YATES, JACOB L · 2022 to 2024
$747k
Neural mechanisms of active vision in the foveaK99EY032179 · NEI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI YATES, JACOB L · 2021 to 2022
$224k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY032179NEI NIH HHS R00 EY032179NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030998NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each time we make an eye movement, attention moves before the eyes, resulting in a perceptual enhancement at the target. Recent psychophysical studies suggest that this pre-saccadic attention enhances the visual features at the saccade target, whereas covert attention causes only spatially selective enhancements. While previous nonhuman primate studies have found that pre-saccadic attention does enhance neural responses spatially, no studies have tested whether changes in neural tuning reflect an automatic feature enhancement. Here we examined pre-saccadic attention using a saccade foraging task developed for marmoset monkeys (one male and one female). We recorded from neurons in the middle temporal area with peripheral receptive fields that contained a motion stimulus, which would either be the target of a saccade or a distracter as a saccade was made to another location. We established that marmosets, like macaques, show enhanced pre-saccadic neural responses for saccades toward the receptive field, including increases in firing rate and motion information. We then examined if the specific changes in neural tuning might support feature enhancements for the target. Neurons exhibited diverse changes in tuning but predominantly showed additive and multiplicative increases that were uniformly applied across motion directions. These findings confirm that marmoset monkeys, like macaques, exhibit pre-saccadic neural enhancements during saccade foraging tasks with minimal training requirements. However, at the level of individual neurons, the lack of feature-tuned enhancements is similar to neural effects reported during covert spatial attention.

Indexed as

CallithrixSaccadesAnimalsAttentionEye MovementsFemaleMacacaMalePhotic Stimulationattentionmarmosetmiddle temporal areamotionsaccadictuning

Identifiers

PMID38050176
PMCPMC10860570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.