Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050168›Full record

ArticleThorax2024

QRISK3 underestimates the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with COPD.

Joseph Emil Amegadzie, Zhiwei Gao, Jennifer K Quint, Richard Russell, John R Hurst, Tae Yoon Lee, Don D Sin, Wenjia Chen, Mona Bafadhel, Mohsen Sadatsafavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methods to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joseph Emil AmegadzieRespiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0459-7241
Zhiwei GaoDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Jennifer K QuintSchool of Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-4869
Richard RussellRespiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John R HurstAcademic Unit of Respiratory Medicine, University College London Medical School, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7246-6040
Tae Yoon LeeRespiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Don D SinCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-6643
Wenjia ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-7145
Mona BafadhelKing's Centre of Lung Health, Peter Gorer Dept of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9993-2478
Mohsen SadatsafaviRespiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada msafavi@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0419-7862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The extent to which the excess CVD risk is captured by risk factors in QRISK, a widely used CVD risk scoring tool, is not well studied.

methodsWe created an incidence cohort of diagnosed COPD patients from the United Kingdom (UK) Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (January 1998-July 2018). The outcome was a composite of fatal or non-fatal CVD events. Sex-specific age-standardised incidence ratios (SIR) were compared with values for the UK primary-care population. The observed 10-year CVD risk was derived using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and was compared with predicted 10-year risk from the QRISK3 tool.

results13 208 patients (mean age 64.9 years, 45% women) were included. CVD incidence was 3.53 events per 100 person-years. The SIR of CVD was 1.71 (95% CI 1.61 to 1.75) in women and 1.62 (95%CI 1.54-1.64) in men. SIR was particularly high among patients younger than 65 years (women=2.13 (95% CI 1.94 to 2.19); men=1.86 (95% CI 1.74 to 1.90)). On average, the observed 10-year risk was 52% higher than QRISK predicted score (33.5% vs 22.1%). The difference was higher in patients younger than 65 years (observed risk 82% higher than predicted).

conclusionPeople living with COPD are at a significantly heightened risk of CVD over and beyond their predicted risk. This is particularly the case for younger people whose 10-year CVD risk can be >80% higher than predicted. Risk scoring tools must be validated and revised to provide accurate CVD predictions in patients with COPD.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited KingdomClinical EpidemiologyCOPD epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID38050168
PMCPMC11287579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.