Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050100›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Does Ipsilateral Remapping Following Hand Loss Impact Motor Control of the Intact Hand?

Raffaele Tucciarelli, Naveed Ejaz, Daan B Wesselink, Vijay Kolli, Carl J Hodgetts, Jörn Diedrichsen, Tamar R Makin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raffaele TucciarelliMRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom tamar.makin@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk t.makin@ucl.ac.uk raffaele.tucciarelli@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk r.tucciarelli@ucl.ac.uk.
Naveed EjazDepartments of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences and Computer Science, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Daan B WesselinkWIN Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Vijay KolliQueen Mary's Hospital, London SW15 5PN, United Kingdom.
Carl J HodgettsCUBRIC, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-2447
Jörn DiedrichsenDepartments of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences and Computer Science, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-8532
Tamar R MakinMRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom tamar.makin@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk t.makin@ucl.ac.uk raffaele.tucciarelli@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk r.tucciarelli@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-8979

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/10Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What happens once a cortical territory becomes functionally redundant? We studied changes in brain function and behavior for the remaining hand in humans (male and female) with either a missing hand from birth (one-handers) or due to amputation. Previous studies reported that amputees, but not one-handers, show increased ipsilateral activity in the somatosensory territory of the missing hand (i.e., remapping). We used a complex finger task to explore whether this observed remapping in amputees involves recruiting more neural resources to support the intact hand to meet greater motor control demands. Using basic fMRI analysis, we found that only amputees had more ipsilateral activity when motor demand increased; however, this did not match any noticeable improvement in their behavioral task performance. More advanced multivariate fMRI analyses showed that amputees had stronger and more typical representation-relative to controls' contralateral hand representation-compared with one-handers. This suggests that in amputees, both hand areas work together more collaboratively, potentially reflecting the intact hand's efference copy. One-handers struggled to learn difficult finger configurations, but this did not translate to differences in univariate or multivariate activity relative to controls. Additional white matter analysis provided conclusive evidence that the structural connectivity between the two hand areas did not vary across groups. Together, our results suggest that enhanced activity in the missing hand territory may not reflect intact hand function. Instead, we suggest that plasticity is more restricted than generally assumed and may depend on the availability of homologous pathways acquired early in life.

Indexed as

AmputeesBrain MappingAmputation, SurgicalFemaleFunctional LateralityHandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTask Performance and AnalysisamputeesfingersfMRIhandmotor controlplasticityprimary motor cortexprimary somatosensory cortex

Identifiers

PMID38050100
PMCPMC10860625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.