Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38050032›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023

Brain Age Estimation on a Dementia Cohort Using FLAIR MRI Biomarkers.

Owen Crystal, Pejman J Maralani, Sandra Black, Corinne Fischer, Alan R Moody, April Khademi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Owen CrystalFrom the Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering (O.C., A.K.), Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ocrystal@torontomu.ca.ORCID 0009-0005-8326-3109
Pejman J MaralaniDepartment of Medical Imaging (P.J.M., A.R.M., A.K.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9975-4379
Sandra BlackInstitute of Medical Science (S.B., C.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Corinne FischerInstitute of Medical Science (S.B., C.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alan R MoodyDepartment of Medical Imaging (P.J.M., A.R.M., A.K.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5221-4305
April KhademiFrom the Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering (O.C., A.K.), Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-0385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease presents an imperative intervention window. This work focuses on using brain age prediction models and biomarkers from FLAIR MR imaging to identify subjects who progress to Alzheimer's disease (converting mild cognitive impairment) or those who remain stable (stable mild cognitive impairment). MATERIALS AND

methodsA machine learning model was trained to predict the age of normal control subjects on the basis of volume, intensity, and texture features from 3239 FLAIR MRI volumes. The brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE) was computed as the difference between the predicted and true age, and it was used as a biomarker for both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Differences in biomarker means, slopes, and intercepts were investigated using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Correlation analysis was performed between brain age gap estimation and established Alzheimer's disease indicators.

resultsThe brain age prediction model showed accurate results (mean absolute error = 2.46 years) when testing on held out normal control data. The computed BrainAGE metric showed significant differences between the stable mild cognitive impairment and converting mild cognitive impairment groups in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, most notably showing significant differences up to 4 years before conversion to Alzheimer's disease. A significant correlation was found between BrainAGE and previously established Alzheimer's disease conversion biomarkers.

conclusionsThe BrainAGE metric can allow clinicians to consider a single explainable value that summarizes all the biomarkers because it considers many dimensions of disease and can determine whether the subject has normal aging patterns or if he or she is trending into a high-risk category using a single value.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBiomarkersBrainChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38050032
PMCPMC10714845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.