ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2023
CT of the Larynx: Is an Additional High-Resolution Acquisition Necessary for Diagnostic Accuracy?
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDiagnostic CT of the larynx is historically performed with a protocol that combines a standard neck CT with dedicated imaging through the larynx. Multichannel CT scanners, however, allow high-resolution reformatted images of the larynx to be created directly from the initial neck acquisition data. The purpose of this study was to determine whether reformatted laryngeal images derived from a standard neck CT acquisition provide information comparable with that of separate dedicated high-resolution laryngeal images. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe CT protocol for suspected laryngeal masses at our institution consists of a standard neck acquisition followed by a second acquisition focused on the larynx. We enrolled 200 patients who had undergone this protocol for a suspected laryngeal mass. Two head and neck radiologists independently reviewed each of the 200 scans twice. In one session, the entire scan was available, while in the other session, only images derived from the standard neck acquisition were available. The main outcome variable was the frequency of discrepant tumor staging between the interpretation sessions. No pathologic reference standard was used.
resultsRadiologist A had discrepant staging in 45 of the 200 scans (23%; 95% CI, 17%-29%). Radiologist B had discrepant staging in 42 of the 200 scans (21%; 95% CI, 16%-27%). Fifty-three of the 87 discrepancies (61%) reflected improper downstaging of the laryngeal tumor on standard images alone, while the other 34 (39%) had improper upstaging on standard images alone.
conclusionsReformatted images from our institution's standard neck CT acquisition were less accurate than dedicated images of the larynx for analysis of laryngeal tumor extension. Focused images of the larynx were needed to optimize interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.