Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049919›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and prognostic research2023

Replicability and reproducibility of predictive models for diagnosis of depression among young adults using Electronic Health Records.

David Nickson, Henrik Singmann, Caroline Meyer, Carla Toro, Lukasz Walasek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David NicksonWMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. david.nickson@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1995-224X
Henrik SingmannDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-3657
Caroline MeyerWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-299X
Carla ToroWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6351-1340
Lukasz WalasekDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7360-0037
University of Warwick · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council 2300953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in machine learning combined with the growing availability of digitized health records offer new opportunities for improving early diagnosis of depression. An emerging body of research shows that Electronic Health Records can be used to accurately predict cases of depression on the basis of individual's primary care records. The successes of these studies are undeniable, but there is a growing concern that their results may not be replicable, which could cast doubt on their clinical usefulness.

methodsTo address this issue in the present paper, we set out to reproduce and replicate the work by Nichols et al. (2018), who trained predictive models of depression among young adults using Electronic Healthcare Records. Our contribution consists of three parts. First, we attempt to replicate the methodology used by the original authors, acquiring a more up-to-date set of primary health care records to the same specification and reproducing their data processing and analysis. Second, we test models presented in the original paper on our own data, thus providing out-of-sample prediction of the predictive models. Third, we extend past work by considering several novel machine-learning approaches in an attempt to improve the predictive accuracy achieved in the original work.

resultsIn summary, our results demonstrate that the work of Nichols et al. is largely reproducible and replicable. This was the case both for the replication of the original model and the out-of-sample replication applying NRCBM coefficients to our new EHRs data. Although alternative predictive models did not improve model performance over standard logistic regression, our results indicate that stepwise variable selection is not stable even in the case of large data sets.

conclusionWe discuss the challenges associated with the research on mental health and Electronic Health Records, including the need to produce interpretable and robust models. We demonstrated some potential issues associated with the reliance on EHRs, including changes in the regulations and guidelines (such as the QOF guidelines in the UK) and reliance on visits to GP as a predictor of specific disorders.

Indexed as

DepressionElectronic health recordsMachine learningPredictive modellingReplicabilityReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID38049919
PMCPMC10696659
OpenAlexW4389323086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.