Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049849›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Guidance provided by pharmacists to customers regarding to destination of unused household medications: disposal of household medications.

Aparecida de Fatima Michelin, Neuza Alves Bonifácio, Walter Bertequini Nagata, Valéria Maria Savoya da Silva, Laura Emilia Michelin Gobbo, Katia Denise Saraiva Bresciani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Knowledge and Practices on Household Disposal of Unused Antimicrobials in Ho Municipality, Ghana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aparecida de Fatima MichelinSchool of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rua Clóvis Pestana, no 793, Araçatuba, 16050-680, SP, Brazil. cidinhamichelin@gmail.com.
Neuza Alves BonifácioSchool of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rua Clóvis Pestana, no 793, Araçatuba, 16050-680, SP, Brazil.
Walter Bertequini NagataSecretary of Agriculture and Supply, Coordination of Agricultural Defense, Lins, SP, Brazil.
Valéria Maria Savoya da SilvaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rua Clóvis Pestana, no 793, Araçatuba, 16050-680, SP, Brazil.
Laura Emilia Michelin GobboFaculty of Medicine, San Camilo University Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Katia Denise Saraiva BrescianiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rua Clóvis Pestana, no 793, Araçatuba, 16050-680, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRCentro Universitário São Camilo · BROffice of the Secretary of Defense · USUniversidade Paulista · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscarding pharmaceuticals in the garbage or into the sewage system are still the most common methods in many countries. This study aims to investigate the guidance provided by pharmacists to customers on the disposal of unused and expired household medications in São Paulo State, Brazil.

methodThe study population consisted of 630 pharmacists from the State of São Paulo, who work in community pharmacies. They answered an online questionnaire with questions composed in three blocks: demographic, work, and academic information on the pharmacist; guidance about the disposal of household medications; and knowledge regarding the reverse logistics of these medications. An invitation to participate in the questionnaire was made via WhatsApp, individually and collectively. Inferential statistics were performed using the chi-square test and were considered significant when p < 0.05%.

resultsAmong the participating pharmacists, the majority were women under 60 years old,56 (8.89%) stated that they never orient the customer regarding the disposal of unused and expired household medications, while 574 (91,12%) indicated that they almost provide guidance. The frequency with which they provided guidance was influenced by the number of years since graduation (p = 0.0047), the time they had worked in pharmacies and drugstores (p = 0.0007), and whether or not they had a graduate degree (p = 0.0181). Regarding the disposal of medications, among the 643 responses provided by the pharmacists,516 (80.25%) indicated that they oriented customers to return them to a pharmacy.

conclusionA small number of pharmacists always orient customers on the proper disposal that should be followed for unused and expired household medications, prioritizing their return to a pharmacy. In general, these pharmacists have longer periods of work experience and higher academic qualifications. Thus, it is important to increase knowledge through professional training and further education programs.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsBrazilDeathFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmaceutical PreparationsSurveys and QuestionnairesPharmaceutical PreparationsAttitudesBrazilDisposalHousehold medicationPhamacistsPracticeUnused medicines

Identifiers

PMID38049849
PMCPMC10694965
OpenAlexW4389310809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.