Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049806›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

High-density transcranial direct current stimulation to improve upper limb motor function following stroke: study protocol for a double-blind randomized clinical trial targeting prefrontal and/or cerebellar cognitive contributions to voluntary motion.

Xavier Corominas-Teruel, Martina Bracco, Montserrat Fibla, Rosa Maria San Segundo, Marc Villalobos-Llaó, Cecile Gallea, Benoit Beranger, Monica Toba, Antoni Valero-Cabré, Maria Teresa Colomina

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05329818 (Clinical, Electrophysiological and E-field Modelling Evidence of High Density Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Motor Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05329818 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clinical, Electrophysiological and E-field Modelling Evidence of High Density Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Motor Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorXavier CorominasRan2021 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsStrokeArmshigh definition transcranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xavier Corominas-TeruelSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Groupe de Dynamiques Cérébrales, Plasticité Et Rééducation, FRONTLAB Team, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Martina BraccoSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Groupe de Dynamiques Cérébrales, Plasticité Et Rééducation, FRONTLAB Team, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Montserrat FiblaRehabilitation and Physical Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
Rosa Maria San SegundoRehabilitation and Physical Medicine Department, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
Marc Villalobos-LlaóDepartment of Psychology and Research Center for Behaviour Assessment (CRAMC), Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Neurobehaviour and Health Research Group, NEUROLAB, Tarragona, Spain.
Cecile GalleaSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Movement Investigation and Therapeutics Team, MOVIT Team, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Benoit BerangerSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Centre de Neuro-Imagerie de Recherche, CENIR, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Monica TobaSorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Groupe de Dynamiques Cérébrales, Plasticité Et Rééducation, FRONTLAB Team, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Antoni Valero-Cabré *Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Groupe de Dynamiques Cérébrales, Plasticité Et Rééducation, FRONTLAB Team, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France. antoni.valerocabre@icm-institute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-2279
Maria Teresa Colomina *Department of Psychology and Research Center for Behaviour Assessment (CRAMC), Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Neurobehaviour and Health Research Group, NEUROLAB, Tarragona, Spain. mariateresa.colomina@urv.cat.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ESUniversitat Rovira i Virgili · ESBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal brain lesions following a stroke of the middle cerebral artery induce large-scale network disarray with a potential to impact multiple cognitive and behavioral domains. Over the last 20 years, non-invasive brain neuromodulation via electrical (tCS) stimulation has shown promise to modulate motor deficits and contribute to recovery. However, weak, inconsistent, or at times heterogeneous outcomes using these techniques have also highlighted the need for novel strategies and the assessment of their efficacy in ad hoc controlled clinical trials.

methodsWe here present a double-blind, sham-controlled, single-center, randomized pilot clinical trial involving participants having suffered a unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke resulting in motor paralysis of the contralateral upper limb. Patients will undergo a 10-day regime (5 days a week for 2 consecutive weeks) of a newly designed high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) protocol. Clinical evaluations (e.g., Fugl Meyer, NIHSS), computer-based cognitive assessments (visuo-motor adaptation and AX-CPT attention tasks), and electroencephalography (resting-state and task-evoked EEG) will be carried out at 3 time points: (I) Baseline, (II) Post-tDCS, and (III) Follow-up. The study consists of a four-arm trial comparing the impact on motor recovery of three active anodal tDCS conditions: ipsilesional DLPFC tDCS, contralesional cerebellar tDCS or combined DLPFC + contralesional cerebellar tDCS, and a sham tDCS intervention. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE) is selected as the primary outcome measure to quantify motor recovery. In every stimulation session, participants will receive 20 min of high-density tDCS stimulation (HD-tDCS) (up to 0.63 mA/[Formula: see text]) with [Formula: see text] electrodes. Electrode scalp positioning relative to the cortical surface (anodes and cathodes) and intensities are based on a biophysical optimization model of current distribution ensuring a 0.25 V/m impact at each of the chosen targets. DISCUSSION: Our trial will gauge the therapeutic potential of accumulative sessions of HD-tDCS to improve upper limb motor and cognitive dysfunctions presented by middle cerebral artery stroke patients. In parallel, we aim at characterizing changes in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity as biomarkers of clinical effects and at identifying potential interactions between tDCS impact and motor performance outcomes. Our work will enrich our mechanistic understanding on prefrontal and cerebellar contributions to motor function and its rehabilitation following brain damage.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05329818. April 15, 2022.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationCognitionDouble-Blind MethodHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeUpper ExtremityNeurorehabilitationPlasticityRandomized controlled trialStrokeTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38049806
PMCPMC10694989
OpenAlexW4389308366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.