Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049788›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Facilitators and barriers to communication in rehabilitation services across healthcare levels: a qualitative case study in a Norwegian context.

Randi Skumsnes, Hilde Thygesen, Karen Synne Groven

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Randi SkumsnesCentre for Diaconia and Professional Practice, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway. randi.skumsnes@stavanger.kommune.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5396-732X
Hilde ThygesenCentre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Borre, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-0662
Karen Synne GrovenDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Health Technolgy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5208-0714
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOVID Specialized University · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 311897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with problems in functioning following severe injury or illness often need multiple and combined interventions in their rehabilitation processes. In these processes, communication and collaboration between the involved healthcare professionals are essential. Despite efforts in research and policy, communication across hospital and primary healthcare services and within the primary healthcare settings remains challenging. In one region of Norway, a new intermunicipal rehabilitation team has been established to supplement the traditional services and context-bound research is needed to gain insight into the complexity of the new communication structures that are developing. The aim of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to communication to inform further improvement of the services.

methodsA qualitative case study design was used to explore the exchange of patient information in the rehabilitation processes of four patients. Data collection included participant observations in communication situations and an exploration of the electronic patient records of these four patients. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the empirical data.

resultsThe complex rehabilitation processes explored involved a large number of actors across healthcare organisational levels. Lacking a common culture for rehabilitation, poor access to written information and unclear responsibility for sharing information across organisational boundaries seemed to represent barriers to interprofessional communication. Joint meetings, the use of common rehabilitation tools and language and establishing informal communication channels served to facilitate communication.

conclusionThe intermunicipal team collaborating across different organisational levels added complexity to communication structures, but also facilitated interprofessional communication by promoting formal and informal ways of exchanging information. However, the intricate organisational divisions of healthcare provision in the Norwegian context represent boundaries which can be difficult to overcome. Therefore, cross-organisational coordination services should be developed.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth ServicesAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansLanguageQualitative ResearchAccess to informationCoordinationInformal communicationInformation sharingInterprofessional communicationOrganisational boundariesRehabilitation cultureUnclear responsibilities

Identifiers

PMID38049788
PMCPMC10696812
OpenAlexW4389298019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.