Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049710›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2023

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on services for patients with chronic kidney disease: findings of a national survey of UK kidney centres.

Lucy Mackintosh, Amanda Busby, Ken Farrington, Janine Hawkins, Sarah Afuwape, Paul Bristow, Maria Da Silva-Gane, Natalie Hall, Tess Harris, Joanna Hudson and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy Mackintosh *School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK. l.mackintosh@herts.ac.uk.
Amanda Busby *School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Ken FarringtonSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Janine HawkinsSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Sarah AfuwapeNephrology, Urology and Renal Transplant, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
Paul BristowKidney Care UK, Alton, GU34 1EF, UK.
Maria Da Silva-GaneRenal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK.
Natalie HallSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Tess HarrisThe Polycystic Kidney Disease Charity, 91 Royal College St, London, NW1 0SE, UK.
Joanna HudsonHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Sam NortonHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Paula OrmandySchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Christina J PearceHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Shalini SanthakumaranThe UK Kidney Association, Brandon House, Building 20a1, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS34 7RR, UK.
Shivani SharmaSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Sivakumar SridharanSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Retha SteenkampThe UK Kidney Association, Brandon House, Building 20a1, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS34 7RR, UK.
Julie SlevinThe UK Kidney Association, Brandon House, Building 20a1, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS34 7RR, UK.
David WellstedSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK.
Joseph ChilcotHealth Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
University of Hertfordshire · GBKidney Care UK · GBKing's College London · GBLister Hospital · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundServices for patients with kidney disease underwent radical adaptations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We undertook an online national survey of UK kidney centres to understand the nature, range, and degree of variation in these changes and to explore factors contributing to differing practice.

methodsThe survey was designed by a multidisciplinary team of kidney professionals, service users and researchers. It enquired about centre services and staffing, including psychosocial provision, and changes to these in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Links to the survey were sent to all 68 UK kidney centres and remained active from December 2021 to April 2022, and a revised version to nurses in late 2022 for additional data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Content analysis on free-text responses identified common themes.

resultsAnalysable responses were received from 41 out of the 68 UK centres (60%), with partial data from an additional 7 (11%). Adaptations were system-wide and affected all aspects of service provision. Some changes were almost universal such as virtual consultations for outpatient appointments, with significant variation in others. Outpatient activity varied from fully maintained to suspended. Many centres reduced peritoneal dialysis access provision but in some this was increased. Centres considered that changes to transplant surgical services and for patients with advanced CKD approaching end-stage kidney disease had the greatest impact on patients. Few centres implemented adjustments aimed at vulnerable and underrepresented groups, including the frail elderly, people with language and communication needs, and those with mental health needs. Communication issues were attributed to rapid evolution of the pandemic, changing planning guidance and lack of resources. Staffing shortages, involving all staff groups particularly nurses, mainly due to COVID-19 infection and redeployment, were compounded by deficiencies in staffing establishments and high vacancy levels. Centres cited three main lessons influencing future service delivery, the need for service redesign, improvements in communication, and better support for staff.

conclusionKidney centre responses to the pandemic involved adaptations across the whole service. Though some changes were almost universal, there was wide variation in other areas. Exploring the role of centre characteristics may help planning for potential future severe service disruptions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Renal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedHumansKidneyPandemicsRenal DialysisUnited KingdomChronic kidney diseaseCoronavirusKidney careService provision

Identifiers

PMID38049710
PMCPMC10696738
OpenAlexW4389303672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.