ArticleEmergency radiology2024
Prevalence of SIRS with primary epiploic appendagitis.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrimary epiploic appendagitis (PEA) is not an uncommon cause of abdominal pain. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria have high sensitivity for early detection of inflammation and infection. To date, there is limited data about the association between SIRS and PEA. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the prevalence of SIRS response and its clinical relevance in patients diagnosed with PEA within a large tertiary hospital network.
methodsA retrospective study was performed on all consecutive adult patients who presented to four major emergency departments with CT-confirmed PEA from 01 January 2022 to 27 March 2023. The fulfilment of SIRS criteria, hospital admission rate and treatments provided were analysed for these patients.
resultsSeventy-three patients had CT-confirmed PEA. Seventeen patients (23.2%) with PEA were SIRS positive. The hospital admission rate in the SIRS group trended higher than the non-SIRS group (odds ratio of 2.51, 95% CI (0.75, 8.39)). The odds of having an associated radiological comorbidity unrelated to PEA were 18.7 times higher in the SIRS positive group. Fifty-seven (78%) patients were discharged home, and 16 (22%) patients were admitted into hospital. Nearly all patients were treated conservatively (98.6%).
conclusionPEA patients with SIRS response trend towards a higher hospital admission rate and are significantly more likely to have other radiological comorbidities than non-SIRS patients. It is important to look for other pathological conditions in a SIRS positive patient with a CT-diagnosis of PEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.