Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049574›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024

An extension of the shifted Wald model of human response times: Capturing the time dynamic properties of human cognition : Trial-varying Wald model.

Zachary L Howard, Elizabeth L Fox, Nathan J Evans, Shayne Loft, Joseph Houpt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zachary L HowardSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia. zach.howard@uwa.edu.au.
Elizabeth L FoxAir Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB Ohio, Dayton, OH, USA.
Nathan J EvansSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shayne LoftSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Joseph HouptCollege for Health, Community and Policy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

Australian Research Council DE200101130, DE200101130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ubiquitous nature of evidence accumulation models in cognitive and experimental psychology, there has been a comparatively limited uptake of such techniques in the applied literature. While quantifying latent cognitive processing properties has significant potential for applied domains such as adaptive work systems, accumulator models often fall short in practical applications. Two primary reasons for these shortcomings are the complexities and time needed for the application of cognitive models, and the failure of current models to capture systematic trial-to-trial variability in parameters. In this manuscript, we develop a novel, trial-varying extension of the shifted Wald model to address these concerns. By leveraging conjugate properties of the Wald distribution, we derive computationally efficient solutions for threshold and drift parameters which can be updated instantaneously with new data. The resulting model allows the quantification of systematic variation in latent cognitive parameters across trials and we demonstrate the utility of such analyses through simulations and an exemplar application to an existing data set. The analytic nature of our solutions opens the door for real-world applications, significantly extending the reach of computational models of behavioral responses.

Indexed as

CognitionModels, PsychologicalReaction TimeHumansModels, StatisticalAdaptive automationBayesianCognitive modelWorkload

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.