ArticleScientific reports2023
Nanofluidic qPCR unable to detect and serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae in urine samples of hospitalized South African patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumonia is a major cause of death among adults living with HIV in South Africa, but the etiology of many cases remains unknown. This study evaluated the utility of a nanofluidic qPCR assay to detect and serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae in urine samples from patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The nanofluidic qPCR assay was optimized to target 13 pneumococcal serotypes and 4 reference genes. Archived urine samples collected from patients > 15 years of age hospitalized with pneumonia between April 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively tested using the nanofluidic qPCR assay, BinaxNOW urine antigen test, and standard LytA qPCR. Blood culture was undertaken on a subset of the samples at the discretion of the attending physician. Cohens' Kappa statistics were used to determine the concordance between the methods. Of the 828 adults hospitalized for CAP, urine samples were available in 53% (n = 439). Of those, a random subset of 96 (22%) samples underwent testing. Of the participants included in the final analysis, the mean age was 45.8 years (SD 16.2), 49% (n = 47) were female, 98% (n = 94) were black, and 66% (n = 63) were living with HIV infection. The nanofluidic qPCR method was able to detect PCV13 vaccine strains spiked into urine samples; however, the method failed to detect any pneumococcus in clinical samples. In comparison, 19% of the pneumonia cases were attributed to S. pneumoniae using urine antigen testing. Nanofluidic qPCR is unable to detect and serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae in urine samples of South Africans hospitalized with CAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.