Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049431›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Microplastic burden in marine benthic invertebrates depends on species traits and feeding ecology within biogeographical provinces.

Adam Porter, Jasmin A Godbold, Ceri N Lewis, Georgie Savage, Martin Solan, Tamara S Galloway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A step towards microlitter risk assessment: modelling microlitter storage potential of the UK seabed.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam PorterDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK. a.porter@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-3216
Jasmin A GodboldSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-8188
Ceri N LewisDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-2906
Georgie SavageDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7986-5813
Martin SolanSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-5574
Tamara S GallowayDepartment of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Exeter, EX4 4QD, UK.

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/S003975/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microplastic body burden of marine animals is often assumed to reflect levels of environmental contamination, yet variations in feeding ecology and regional trait expression could also affect a species' risk of contaminant uptake. Here, we explore the global inventory of individual microplastic body burden for invertebrate species inhabiting marine sediments across 16 biogeographic provinces. We show that individual microplastic body burden in benthic invertebrates cannot be fully explained by absolute levels of microplastic contamination in the environment, because interspecific differences in behaviour and feeding ecology strongly determine microplastic uptake. Our analyses also indicate a degree of species-specific particle selectivity; likely associated with feeding biology. Highest microplastic burden occurs in the Yellow and Mediterranean Seas and, contrary to expectation, amongst omnivores, predators, and deposit feeders rather than suspension feeding species. Our findings highlight the inadequacy of microplastic uptake risk assessments based on inventories of environmental contamination alone, and the need to understand how species behaviour and trait expression covary with microplastic contamination.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsAquatic OrganismsEcologyEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringInvertebratesPlasticsMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID38049431
PMCPMC10696022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.