Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049427›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

IoT and ML approach for ornamental fish behaviour analysis.

K Suresh Kumar Patro, Vinod Kumar Yadav, Vidya S Bharti, Arun Sharma, Arpita Sharma, T Senthilkumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K Suresh Kumar PatroFisheries Economics, Extension & Statistics Division (FEESD), ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
Vinod Kumar YadavFisheries Economics, Extension & Statistics Division (FEESD), ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India. vinodkumar@cife.edu.in.
Vidya S BhartiAquatic Environment & Health Management Division (AEHMD), ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
Arun SharmaAquatic Environment & Health Management Division (AEHMD), ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
Arpita SharmaFisheries Economics, Extension & Statistics Division (FEESD), ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
T SenthilkumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, 641112, India.
Central Institute of Fisheries Education · INAmrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ornamental fish keeping is the second most preferred hobby in the world and it provides a great opportunity for entrepreneurship development and income generation. Controlling the environment in ornamental fish farm is a considerable challenge because it is affected by a variety of parameters like water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and disease occurrences. One particular interesting ornamental fish species is goldfish (Carassius auratus). Machine learning (ML) and deep learning technique have significant potential in analysing voluminous data collected from fish farm. Through this technique, the fish farmers can get insight on feeding behaviour, fish growth patterns, predict diseases/stress, and environmental factors affecting fish health. The aim of the study is to analyze the behavioural changes in goldfish due to alterations in environmental parameters (water temperature and dissolved oxygen). Decision tree, Naïve Bayes classifier, K-nearest neighbour (KNN), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to analyse the behavioural change data. To compare the performance between all four classifiers, cross validation and confusion matrix used. The cross-validation error of LDA, Naïve Bayes classification, KNN and decision tree was 19.86, 28.08, 30.14 and 13.78 respectively. Decision tree was proved to be the most accurate and effective classifier. Different temperature and DO range were taken to predict fish behaviour. Some findings are, the behaviour of fish was rest between temperature 37.85 °C and 40.535 °C, erratic when temperature was greater than or equal to 40.535 °C, gasping when temperature was between 37.85 and 40.535 °C and when DO concentration was less than 6.58 mg/L. Blood parameter analysis has been done to validate the change in external behaviours with change in physiological parameters.

Indexed as

GoldfishOxygenAnimalsBayes TheoremTemperatureWaterOxygenWater

Identifiers

PMID38049427
PMCPMC10696071
OpenAlexW4389323749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.