Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38049419›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect.

Jan-Ole Radecke, Andreas Sprenger, Hannah Stöckler, Lisa Espeter, Mandy-Josephine Reichhardt, Lara S Thomann, Tim Erdbrügger, Yvonne Buschermöhle, Stefan Borgwardt, Till R Schneider and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan-Ole RadeckeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany. janole.radecke@uni-luebeck.de.
Andreas SprengerCenter of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Hannah StöcklerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Lisa EspeterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Mandy-Josephine ReichhardtCenter of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Lara S ThomannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Tim ErdbrüggerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Yvonne BuschermöhleInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Stefan BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Till R SchneiderDepartment of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Joachim GrossInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Carsten H WoltersInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Rebekka LencerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
University of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Münster · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit ZMI1-2521FSB006Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR2024/8-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft LE1122/7-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft WO1425/10-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural networks subserving smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) provide an ideal model for investigating the interaction of sensory processing and motor control during ongoing movements. To better understand core plasticity aspects of sensorimotor processing for SPEM, normative sham, anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied over visual area V5 and frontal eye fields (FEF) in sixty healthy participants. The identical within-subject paradigm was used to assess SPEM modulations by practice. While no specific tDCS effects were revealed, within- and between-session practice effects indicate plasticity of top-down extraretinal mechanisms that mainly affect SPEM in the absence of visual input and during SPEM initiation. To explore the potential of tDCS effects, individual electric field simulations were computed based on calibrated finite element head models and individual functional localization of V5 and FEF location (using functional MRI) and orientation (using combined EEG/MEG) was conducted. Simulations revealed only limited electric field target intensities induced by the applied normative tDCS montages but indicate the potential efficacy of personalized tDCS for the modulation of SPEM. In sum, results indicate the potential susceptibility of extraretinal SPEM control to targeted external neuromodulation (e.g., personalized tDCS) and intrinsic learning protocols.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPursuit, Smooth

Identifiers

PMID38049419
PMCPMC10695990
OpenAlexW4389311950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.