ArticleKlinische Padiatrie2025
The oracle of D-A-Ch - Results of a Delphi Survey for the development of the evidence- and consensus-based tool "My Logbook".
Article in Klinische Padiatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "MyLogbook-I Know My Way Around": A Psychological Therapy Program to Enhance Health Literacy and Positive Emotional Adjustment in Pediatric Oncology.Psycho-oncology · 2026Trial
- Benefits of applying standardized frameworks to implement psychosocial tools such as the 'My Logbook'.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present report describes the results of four delphi surveys conducted within the quality improvement project "My Logbook" which aims to translate evidence-based standards for psychosocial care in pediatric oncology into a practical consensus-based tool.
methodsIn four consecutive delphi surveys a total of n=153 international, multi-disciplinary experts rated the content, method, and design of the different booklets of "My Logbook" which a local expert group had conceptualized. After each survey, the feedback was incorporated, and the changes were evaluated in a final consensus vote by the quality assurance panel of the PSAPOH.
resultsWhile some surveys led to a review on a page level, most booklets as a whole reached the consensus-level of approval. Over the course of the surveys, any revisions and comments were incorporated in the booklets, and approval rates increased steadily. DISCUSSION: The delphi surveys ensured the integration of multi-disciplinary, international expertise, uncovering issues such as language barriers and the need for a user manual that would not have been evident in first line . The incorporation of the input led to a continuous improvement of the tool, reflected in steadily increasing acceptance rates in the consecutive survey rounds.
conclusionThe incorporation of the expert input as well as the additional development of a user manual resulted in a final version of the "My Logbook" apt for the interdisciplinary application in pediatric oncology in the entire DACH-region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.