ArticleThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2024
Retraction and republication-Estimating dose-response relationships for vitamin D with coronary heart disease, stroke, and all-cause mortality: observational and Mendelian randomisation analyses.
Article in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Widespread genetic effect heterogeneity impacts bias and power in nonlinear Mendelian randomization.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Lack of Association between Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cardiovascular or Fracture Risk: A UK Biobank Study.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- No More Free Lunch: Challenges to Mendelian Randomization Due to Sample Selection and Complex Methods.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Review
- Cardiovascular disease outcomes in relation to 25-hydroxyvitamin D and its seasonal variation: Results from the BiomarCaRE consortium.PloS one · 2025Article
- Association of vitamin D and bisphenol A levels with cardiovascular risk in an elderly Italian population: results from the InCHIANTI study.GeroScience · 2024Article
- Reclaiming mendelian randomization from the deluge of papers and misleading findings.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Article
- Non-linear Mendelian randomization: detection of biases using negative controls with a focus on BMI, Vitamin D and LDL cholesterol.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Retraction and republication-Estimating dose-response relationships for vitamin D with coronary heart disease, stroke, and all-cause mortality: observational and Mendelian randomisation analyses.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2024Article
- How a Nutritional Deficiency Became Treated with Fluoride.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.