Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38048610›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Parsley: a web app for parsing data from plate readers.

Eszter Csibra, Guy-Bart Stan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eszter CsibraDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology (IC-CSynB), Imperial College London, London SW7 2AY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4759-5921
Guy-Bart StanDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology (IC-CSynB), Imperial College London, London SW7 2AY, United Kingdom.

Funding

Royal Academy of Engineering
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryAs demand for the automation of biological assays has increased over recent years, the range of measurement types implemented by multiwell plate readers has broadened and the list of published software packages that caters to their analysis has grown. However, most plate readers export data in esoteric formats with little or no metadata, while most analytical software packages are built to work with tidy data accompanied by associated metadata. 'Parser' functions are therefore required to prepare raw data for analysis. Such functions are instrument- and data type-specific, and to date, no generic tool exists that can parse data from multiple data types or multiple plate readers, despite the potential for such a tool to speed up access to analysed data and remove an important barrier for less confident coders. We have developed the interactive web application, Parsley, to bridge this gap. Unlike conventional programmatic parser functions, Parsley makes few assumptions about exported data, instead employing user inputs to identify and extract data from data files. In doing so, it is designed to enable any user to parse plate reader data and can handle a wide variety of instruments (10+) and data types (53+). Parsley is freely available via a web interface, enabling access to its unique plate reader data parsing functionality, without the need to install software or write code. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Parsley web application can be accessed at: https://gbstan.shinyapps.io/parsleyapp/. The source code is available at: https://github.com/ec363/parsleyapp and is archived on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/10011752.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAutomationInformation Storage and RetrievalMetadata

Identifiers

PMID38048610
PMCPMC10715767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.