SynthesisPloS one2023
Effect of pueraria on left ventricular remodelling in HFrEF: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of puerarin injection as an adjunctive therapy for chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a prevalent cardiovascular disease globally, posing a significant burden on healthcare and society. Left ventricular remodelling is the primary pathology responsible for HFrEF development and progression, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Pueraria, a traditional Chinese herbal medicine and food, is commonly used in China to treat HFrEF. Accumulating evidence suggests that pueraria can effectively reverse left ventricular remodelling in HFrEF patients. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of pueraria on left ventricular remodelling in HFrEF patients.
methodsEight electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, CQVIP, and CBM were searched for literature from inception to June 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using pueraria in the treatment of HFrEF were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was utilized for RCTs' methodological evaluation, while Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to analyze the data.
resultsNineteen RCTs with a total of 1,911 patients (1,077 males and 834 females) were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that combination medication of pueraria and conventional medicine (CM) was superior to the CM alone in raising left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; MD = 6.46, 95% CI, 4.88 to 8.04, P < 0.00001), and decreasing left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD; MD = -4.78, 95% CI, -6.55 to -3.01, P < 0.00001), left ventricular end-Systolic diameter (LVESD; MD = -3.98, 95% CI, -5.98 to -1.99, P < 0.00001) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; MD = -126.16, 95% CI, -185.30 to -67.03, P < 0.0001). Besides, combination medication improved clinical efficacy rate (RR = 3.42, 95% CI, 2.54 to 4.59, P < 0.00001), 6-min walk test (6-MWT; MD = 65.54, 95% CI, 41.77 to 89.31, P < 0.00001), and TCM syndrome score efficacy (RR = 3.03, 95% CI, 1.57 to 5.83, P = 0.0009). Regarding safety, no difference was observed for adverse events (RR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.54, P = 0.28).
conclusionThe use of pueraria combined with conventional medicine in HFrEF patients has superiority over conventional medicine alone in ameliorating cardiac function and reversing left ventricular remodeling. Moreover, combination medication has no increase in adverse drug events. Given some limitations, more prudence and high-quality clinical trials are needed in the future to verify the conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.