ArticleAging2023
A glycosylation-related signature predicts survival in pancreatic cancer.
Article in Aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- SEL1L confers reduced EMT and drug resistance to breast cancer cells by promoting Shh degradation.iScience · 2025Article
- GLT8D2 is a prognostic biomarker and regulator of immune cell infiltration in gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor initiation and progression are closely associated with glycosylation. However, glycosylated molecules have not been the subject of extensive studies as prognostic markers for pancreatic cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify glycosylation-related genes in pancreatic cancer and use them to construct reliable prognostic models. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases were used to assess the differential expression of glycosylation-related genes; four clusters were identified based on consistent clustering analysis. Kaplan-Meier analyses identified three glycosylation-related genes associated with overall survival. LASSO analysis was then performed on The Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium databases to identify glycosylation-related signatures. We identified 12 GRGs differently expressed in pancreatic cancer and selected three genes (SEL1L, TUBA1C, and SDC1) to build a prognostic model. Thereafter, patients were divided into high and low-risk groups. Eventually, we performed Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to validate the signature.
resultsClinical outcomes were significantly poorer in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. There were also significant correlations between the high-risk group and several risk factors, including no-smoking history, drinking history, radiotherapy history, and lower tumor grade. Furthermore, the high-risk group had a higher proportion of immune cells. Eventually, three glycosylation-related genes were validated in human PC cell lines.
conclusionThis study identified the glycosylation-related signature for pancreatic cancer. It is an effective predictor of survival and can guide treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.