Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38048148›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Guide Development for eHealth Interventions Targeting People With a Low Socioeconomic Position: Participatory Design Approach.

Jasper S Faber, Isra Al-Dhahir, Jos J Kraal, Linda D Breeman, Rita J G van den Berg-Emons, Thomas Reijnders, Sandra van Dijk, Veronica R Janssen, Roderik A Kraaijenhagen, Valentijn T Visch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Digital health equity frameworks and key concepts: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasper S Faber *Department of Human-Centered Design, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0380-0989
Isra Al-Dhahir *Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-3313
Jos J KraalFaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9667-6926
Linda D BreemanFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-2731
Rita J G van den Berg-EmonsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6433-3398
Thomas ReijndersFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2184-8727
Sandra van DijkFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-8421
Veronica R JanssenFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4113-6716
Roderik A KraaijenhagenVital10, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5102-0197
Valentijn T VischFaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5502-1691
Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-9199
Andrea W M EversFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0090-5091
Leiden University · NLDelft University of Technology · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) are less likely to benefit from eHealth interventions, exacerbating social health inequalities. Professionals developing eHealth interventions for this group face numerous challenges. A comprehensive guide to support these professionals in their work could mitigate these inequalities.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a web-based guide to support professionals in the development, adaptation, evaluation, and implementation of eHealth interventions for people with a low SEP.

methodsThis study consisted of 2 phases. The first phase involved a secondary analysis of 2 previous qualitative and quantitative studies. In this phase, we synthesized insights from the previous studies to develop the guide's content and information structure. In the second phase, we used a participatory design process. This process included iterative development and evaluation of the guide's design with 11 professionals who had experience with both eHealth and the target group. We used test versions (prototypes) and think-aloud testing combined with semistructured interviews and a questionnaire to identify design requirements and develop and adapt the guide accordingly.

resultsThe secondary analysis resulted in a framework of recommendations for developing the guide, which was categorized under 5 themes: development, reach, adherence, evaluation, and implementation. The participatory design process resulted in 16 requirements on system, content, and service aspects for the design of the guide. For the system category, the guide was required to have an open navigation strategy leading to more specific information and short pages with visual elements. Content requirements included providing comprehensible information, scientific evidence, a user perspective, information on practical applications, and a personal and informal tone of voice. Service requirements involved improving suitability for different professionals, ensuring long-term viability, and a focus on implementation. Based on these requirements, we developed the final version of "the inclusive eHealth guide."

conclusionsThe inclusive eHealth guide provides a practical, user-centric tool for professionals aiming to develop, adapt, evaluate, and implement eHealth interventions for people with a low SEP, with the aim of reducing health disparities in this population. Future research should investigate its suitability for different end-user goals, its external validity, its applicability in specific contexts, and its real-world impact on social health inequality.

Indexed as

TelemedicineVoiceHealth Status DisparitiesHumanseHealthguideguidelines professionalsintervention developmentintervention evaluationlow socioeconomic positionlow socioeconomic statusrisk groupstailored care

Identifiers

PMID38048148
PMCPMC10728791
OpenAlexW4387065758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.