Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38048100›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2023

Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor.

Angela Aherrera, Joyce Jy Lin, Rui Chen, Mina Tehrani, Andrew Schultze, Aryan Borole, Stefan Tanda, Walter Goessler, Ana M Rule

Open access · diamondAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela AherreraDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-7732
Joyce Jy LinDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8382-1020
Rui ChenDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mina TehraniDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Andrew SchultzeDepartment of Biochemistry, Ithaca College School of Humanities and Sciences, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Aryan BoroleDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stefan TandaInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Walter GoesslerInstitute of Chemistry, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Ana M RuleDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Graz · ATIthaca College · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Training Program in Pediatric PulmonaryT32HL072748 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Michael Collaco · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
The Exposure to Metals from E-Cigarettes (EMIT) StudyR01ES030025 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RULE, ANA MARIA · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
Program on Occupational Health and Safety Education on Emerging Technologies - Mid Atlantic Partnership (POccET MAP)R25ES033038 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, GURUMURTHY · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
Respiratory Effects, Metal and Aldehyde exposure from e-cigarette use in young adults (REMA)R00ES034507 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Angela Aherrera · 2024 to 2026
$747k
ICP-QQQS10OD030355 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RULE, ANA MARIA · 2021 to 2021
$350k
Respiratory Effects, Metal and Aldehyde exposure from e-cigarette use in young adults (REMA)K99ES034507 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AHERRERA, ANGELA · 2022 to 2023
$319k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL072748NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES034507NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES034507NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030025NIEHS NIH HHS R25 ES033038NIH HHS S10 OD030355NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid evolution of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products warrants surveillance of the differences in exposure across device types-modifiable devices (MODs), cartridge ("pod")-containing devices (PODs), disposable PODs (d-PODs)-and flavors of the products available on the market.

objectiveThis study aimed to measure and compare metal aerosol concentrations by device type and common flavors.

methodsWe collected aerosol from 104 MODs, 67 PODs (four brands: JUUL, Bo, Suorin, PHIX), and 23 d-PODs (three brands: ZPOD, Bidi, Stig) via droplet deposition in a series of conical pipette tips. Metals and metalloids [aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), tin (Sn), and zinc (Zn)] were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), results were log-transformed for statistical analysis, and concentrations are reported in aerosol units (

resultsOf the 12 elements analyzed, concentrations were statistically significantly higher in MOD devices, except for Co and Ni, which were higher in PODs and d-PODs. Of the POD brands analyzed, PHIX had the highest median concentrations among four metals (Al, Ni, Pb, and Sn) compared to the rest of the POD brands. According to POD flavor, seven metals were three to seven orders of magnitude higher in tobacco-flavored aerosol compared to those in mint and mango flavors. Among the d-POD brands, concentrations of four metals (Al, Cu, Ni, and Pb) were higher in the ZPOD brand than in Bidi Stick and Stig devices. According to d-POD flavor, only Cr concentrations were found to be statistically significantly higher in mint than tobacco-flavored d-PODs. DISCUSSION: We observed wide variability in aerosol metal concentrations within and between the different e-cigarette device types, brands, and flavors. Overall, MOD devices generated aerosols with higher metal concentrations than PODs and d-PODs, and tobacco-flavored aerosols contained the highest metal concentrations. Continued research is needed to evaluate additional factors (i.e., nicotine type) that contribute to metal exposure from new and emerging e-cigarette devices in order to inform policy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11921.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsAluminumChromiumCopperLeadAerosolsAluminumChromiumCopperLead

Identifiers

PMID38048100
PMCPMC10695266
OpenAlexW4389305200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.