Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38048090›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2024

Photobiomodulation Therapy to Treat Snakebites Caused by Bothrops atrox: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Érica da Silva Carvalho, Andrea Renata do Nascimento Souza, Dessana Francis Chehuan Melo, Altair Seabra de Farias, Bruna Barbosa de Oliveira Macedo, Marco Aurélio Sartim, Mariela Costa Caggy, Beatriz de Alcântara Rodrigues, Gabriela Salini Ribeiro, Heloísa Nunes Reis and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Snakebite Envenomations In The Brazilian Amazon: A Little Less Neglected.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Érica da Silva CarvalhoSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Andrea Renata do Nascimento SouzaSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Dessana Francis Chehuan MeloDepartment of Teaching and Research, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil.
Altair Seabra de FariasSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Bruna Barbosa de Oliveira MacedoDepartment of Teaching and Research, Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio SartimSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Mariela Costa CaggySchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Beatriz de Alcântara RodriguesSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Gabriela Salini RibeiroSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Heloísa Nunes ReisSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Felipe Queiroz AraújoSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Iran Mendonça da SilvaSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
André SachettSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Vanderson de Souza SampaioSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Antônio Alcirley da Silva BalieiroInstituto Leônidas e Maria Deane - ILMD/Fiocruz, Manaus, Brazil.
Stella Regina ZamunerUniversidade Nove de Julho, Uninove, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Ricardo Nickenig VissociDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Duke Global Health Institute (DGHI), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Lioney Nobre CabralSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Wuelton Marcelo MonteiroSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Jacqueline de Almeida Gonçalves SachettSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRFundação de Medicina Tropical · BRDuke Institute for Health Innovation · USFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BRUniversidade Nilton Lins · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Bothrops venom acts almost immediately at the bite site and causes tissue damage. Objective: To investigate the feasibility and explore the safety and efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing the local manifestations of B atrox envenomations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at Fundação de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado, in Manaus, Brazil. A total of 60 adult participants were included from November 2020 to March 2022, with 30 in each group. Baseline characteristics on admission were similarly distributed between groups. Data analysis was performed from August to December 2022. Intervention: The intervention group received LLLT combined with regular antivenom treatment. The laser used was a gallium arsenide laser with 4 infrared laser emitters and 4 red laser emitters, 4 J/cm2 for 40 seconds at each application point. Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility was assessed by eligibility, recruitment, and retention rates; protocol fidelity; and patients' acceptability. The primary efficacy outcome of this study was myolysis estimated by the value of creatine kinase (U/L) on the third day of follow-up. Secondary efficacy outcomes were (1) pain intensity, (2) circumference measurement ratio, (3) extent of edema, (4) difference between the bite site temperature and that of the contralateral limb, (5) need for the use of analgesics, (6) frequency of secondary infections, and (7) necrosis. These outcomes were measured 48 hours after admission. Disability assessment was carried out from 4 to 6 months after patients' discharge. P values for outcomes were adjusted with Bonferroni correction. Results: A total of 60 patients (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [15.3] years; 8 female individuals [13%] and 52 male individuals [87%]) were included. The study was feasible, and patient retention and acceptability were high. Creatine kinase was significantly lower in the LLLT group (mean [SD], 163.7 [160.0] U/L) 48 hours after admission in relation to the comparator (412.4 [441.3] U/L) (P = .03). Mean (SD) pain intensity (2.9 [2.7] vs 5.0 [2.4]; P = .004), circumference measurement ratio (6.6% [6.6%] vs 17.1% [11.6%]; P < .001), and edema extent (25.8 [15.0] vs 40.1 [22.7] cm; P = .002) were significantly lower in the LLLT group in relation to the comparator. No difference was observed between the groups regarding the mean difference between the bite site temperature and the contralateral limb. Secondary infections, necrosis, disability outcomes, and the frequency of need for analgesics were similar in both groups. No adverse event was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: The data from this randomized clinical trial suggest that the use of LLLT was feasible and safe in a hospital setting and effective in reducing muscle damage and the local inflammatory process caused by B atrox envenomations. Trial Registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: RBR-4qw4vf.

Indexed as

CoinfectionLow-Level Light TherapySnake BitesAdultAnalgesicsAnimalsBothrops atroxCreatine KinaseEdemaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsCreatine Kinase

Identifiers

PMID38048090
PMCPMC10696517
OpenAlexW4389298473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.