Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38048018›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from a Global Ulcerative Colitis Narrative Patient Survey.

Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Karoliina Ylänne, Allyson Sipes, Michelle Segovia, Sean Gardiner, Joseph C Cappelleri, Amy Mulvey, Remo Panaccione

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Laurent Peyrin-BirouletDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, 54500, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Karoliina YlänneSidekick Health, Kopavogur, Iceland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-607X
Allyson Sipes, Columbia, SC, USA.
Michelle SegoviaPfizer Inc, 500 Arcola Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA. Michelle.SegoviaMedina@pfizer.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0877-1021
Sean GardinerPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9193-9844
Joseph C CappelleriPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-0748
Amy MulveyThe Harris Poll, Chicago, IL, USA.
Remo PanaccioneDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Pfizer (United States) · USColumbia College - South Carolina · USIcelandic Heart Association · ISInserm · FRUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created challenges related to disease management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

methodsThe UC Narrative COVID-19 survey was conducted from August to December 2021 among adults with UC from the United States, Canada, Japan, France, and Finland. Patients were questioned on disease management, health care access and experience, and preferences for interactions with their doctor. Data were analyzed descriptively.

resultsIn total, 584 patients qualified for and completed the survey. Compared with 2019, 25% experienced more flares during the pandemic (from early 2020). Most patients (88%) taking prescription medication were very/somewhat satisfied with their current treatment plan; 53% were hesitant to make changes during the pandemic. Factors that patients agreed helped control UC symptoms during the pandemic included fewer social outings (37%), working from home (29%), and less busy schedules (28%). Greater anxiety/stress (43%) and hesitancy to visit a hospital/office (34%) made the control of UC symptoms more difficult. Compared with 2019, more patients relied on certain alternative support systems during the pandemic. Patients who used in-person and virtual appointments were equally very satisfied/satisfied with the quality of care (both 81%). In-person appointments were preferred by 68% of patients when meeting a new doctor, 55% when experiencing a flare, and 52% for regular check-ups; 41% preferred virtual appointments for UC prescription refills.

conclusionDuring the pandemic, most patients were satisfied with their current UC treatment plan and access to care; more patients relied on certain alternative UC management support systems, and many were impacted by anxiety/stress.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeCOVID-19AdultHumansPandemicsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 pandemicDisease managementPatient preferencePatient surveyUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID38048018
PMCPMC10838856
OpenAlexW4389307944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.