What is new in the classification of peripheral T cell lymphomas?

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laurence de LevalInstitute of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, 25 rue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. laurence.deleval@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-516X

Bettina BisigInstitute of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Lausanne University, 25 rue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-375X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review focus article, we highlight the main modifications introduced in the latest 2022 International Consensus Classification and World Health Organization classification (ICC and WHO-HAEM5) of mature T (and NK) cell neoplasms (PTCLs) and consequent implications for diagnostic practice. The changes result from recent advances in the genomic and molecular characterization of PTCLs and enhanced understanding of their pathobiology. Specifically, consideration is given to the following groups of diseases: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated neoplasms; follicular helper T cell lymphoma; anaplastic large cell lymphomas; primary intestinal T and NK cell lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders; and PTCL, not otherwise specified.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticLymphoma, T-Cell, PeripheralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansKiller Cells, NaturalAnaplastic large cell lymphomasCell of originFollicular helper T cell lymphomaIntestinal T and NK cell lymphomasMutations

Identifiers

PMID38047948

DOI10.1007/s00292-023-01260-y

PMCPMC10739560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.