Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38047263›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2023

Primary penile melanoma and genital lichen sclerosus.

Kate Dear, Georgios Kravvas, Sharmaine Sim, Evanthia Mastoraki, Mariel James, Richard Watchorn, Aiman Haider, Peter Ellery, Alex Freeman, Hussain M Alnajjar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The acronymisation of lichen sclerosus.Skin health and disease · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kate DearDepartment of Dermatology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-8848
Georgios KravvasDepartment of Dermatology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-0149
Sharmaine SimUniversity College London Medical School London UK.
Evanthia MastorakiDepartment of Dermatology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1013-888X
Mariel JamesDepartment of Dermatology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Richard WatchornDepartment of Dermatology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8337-2501
Aiman HaiderDepartment of Histopathology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Peter ElleryDepartment of Histopathology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Alex FreemanDepartment of Histopathology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Hussain M AlnajjarDepartment of Urology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-0310
Asif MuneerDepartment of Urology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Christopher B BunkerDepartment of Dermatology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-7483

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a well-established association between squamous cell cancer and genital lichen sclerosus (GLSc). Although there have been several reported cases of vulval melanoma (MM) associated with LSc, particularly in the paediatric population, fewer cases of male genital (M) GLSc and penile (Pe)MM have been published. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore further the relationship between PeMM and MGLSc by reviewing all the cases managed by our multidisciplinary service over a finite period. Methods: All patients known to our tertiary urology and male genital dermatology service with a diagnosis of PeMM and where histology was available for review were identified over an 11-year period (2011-2022). The histology was reviewed by two independent, mutually 'blinded' histopathologists. Photographs and clinical notes, where available, were retrospectively reviewed by two independent dermatologists for signs or symptoms of LSc. Results: Eleven patients with PeMM were identified for review. Histopathological examination found evidence of LSc in nine patients, and review of clinical photos corroborated the presence of LSc in three. Overall, features of LSc were present in nine out of eleven cases (82%). Conclusion: The presence of LSc in 9 out of 11 cases of PeMM is suggestive of a causative relationship between LSc and PeMM. This may be due to chronic melanocytic distress created by chronic inflammation secondary to LSc.

Identifiers

PMID38047263
PMCPMC10690690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.