Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38047248›Full record

ArticleSkin health and disease2023

A systematic review of the frequency of features of the seven-point checklist in proven cutaneous melanoma: The importance of change.

Nicola M Congdon, Christina M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical EvaluationIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicola M CongdonUniversity of the West of England Bristol UK.
Christina M DavisUniversity of the West of England Bristol UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pigmented skin lesions in human adults can present with several different visible features that may indicate signs of malignancy, particularly melanoma. Patient and clinician awareness of these features can aid the early recognition and melanoma diagnosis improving patient outcomes. The seven-point checklist (7PCL) is a clinical prediction rule advocated by the National Institute for Health Care Excellence to aid the assessment of pigmented skin lesions in primary care to indicate referral for specialist opinion. Objectives: Assess the current evidence to establish which features of the 7PC present more frequently, so public education and clinician assessment can be focused to maximise early diagnosis and minimise referrals of benign lesions. Methods: A systematic review of published evidence identified studies that assessed the seven features of the 7PCL in histologically proven melanomas. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies and independently extracted data and assessed quality. Results: 112 studies were screened, 20 were assessed in full, seven met the inclusion criteria. 1184 histologically diagnosed melanomas were assessed using the 7PCL. Four studies involved patients assessing 335 melanomas, and three involved clinicians who assessed 849 melanomas. The most common feature identified was a change in size of the lesion, and the least common was inflammation. Conclusions: The most frequently occurring features of melanoma involve shape, size and colour, however focussing on changes in features, rather than irregularity, is more likely to identify early melanoma and increase the accuracy of referrals.

Identifiers

PMID38047248
PMCPMC10690704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.